Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32631810›Full record

ArticleHematology, transfusion and cell therapy

Nutritional status at diagnosis among children with cancer referred to a nutritional service in Brazil.

Karina Viani, Ronald D Barr, Vicente Odone Filho, Elena J Ladas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. The evolution of nutritional care in children and young people with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a narrative review.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karina VianiInstituto de Tratamento do Câncer Infantil, Instituto da Criança, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (ITACI-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: karina.viani@hc.fm.usp.br.
Ronald D BarrMcMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Vicente Odone FilhoInstituto de Tratamento do Câncer Infantil, Instituto da Criança, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (ITACI-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Elena J LadasColumbia University Medical Center, New York, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChildren and adolescents with cancer are particularly vulnerable to malnutrition and require special attention on nutritional assessment. An adequate nutritional status during treatment is essential in reducing morbidity and mortality, being a modifiable risk factor for clinical outcomes. This study aims to determine the nutritional status of pediatric patients with cancer assessed by the nutrition team at diagnosis and evaluate its association with the overall survival.

methodThis is a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients at the time of cancer diagnosis who had nutritional assessments when hospitalized or referred to the nutrition outpatient clinic. Nutritional status was classified by the mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and body mass index for age z-score (zBMI/A). The Cox regression analysis was used to determine the association between the nutritional status and overall survival, adjusting for gender, tumor group and age.

resultsThe study included 366 patients. The prevalence of undernutrition varied from 8 to 23% and overweight, from 5 to 20%. The MUAC identified more children as undernourished than the zBMI/A in patients with solid and hematological tumors. There was no significant difference in the overall survival by malnutrition classified by the zBMI/A (p =  0.1507) or MUAC (p =  0.8135). When adjusted for gender, tumor group and age, the nutritional status classification by the zBMI/A (hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.83; p =  0.209) and MUAC (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.61-1.44; p =  0.773) did not impact overall survival.

conclusionThe nutritional status at diagnosis did not significantly impact the overall survival, which suggests there may have been a protective effect by successful nutritional intervention during the subsequent care.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrazilChildNeoplasms/metabolismNutritional status

Identifiers

PMID32631810
PMCPMC8573002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.