Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32631660›Full record

Observational studyThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2022

Determinants of hospital variability in perioperative red blood cell transfusions during coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

David C Fitzgerald, Annie N Simpson, Robert A Baker, Xiaoting Wu, Min Zhang, Michael P Thompson, Gaetano Paone, Alphonse Delucia, Donald S Likosky, PERForm Registry and the Michigan Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons Quality Collaborative

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational StudyVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Adult Clinical Perfusion Practice Survey: 2020 results.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Commentary: Culture trumps (transfusion) guidelines.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David C FitzgeraldCollege of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. Electronic address: fitzgerd@musc.edu.
Annie N SimpsonCollege of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Robert A BakerCardiac Surgery Perfusion Services and Quality and Outcomes Unit, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Xiaoting WuDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Min ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Michael P ThompsonDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Gaetano PaoneDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich.
Alphonse DeluciaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Bronson Methodist Hospital, Kalamazoo, Mich.
Donald S LikoskyDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
PERForm Registry and the Michigan Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons Quality Collaborative

Funding

Novel Assessments of Technical and Non-Technical Cardiac Surgery QualityR01HL146619 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LIKOSKY, DONALD S, PAGANI, FRANCIS D · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
Understanding and Addressing Variation in Healthcare-Associated Infections After Durable Ventricular Assist Device TherapyR01HS026003 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LIKOSKY, DONALD S · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS026003NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL146619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify to what extent distinguishing patient and procedural characteristics can explain center-level transfusion variation during coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

methodsObservational cohort study using the Perfusion Measures and Outcomes Registry from 43 adult cardiac surgical programs from July 1, 2011, to July 1, 2017. Iterative multilevel logistic regression models were constructed using patient demographic characteristics, preoperative risk factors, and intraoperative conservation strategies to progressively explain center-level transfusion variation.

resultsOf the 22,272 adult patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass, 7241 (32.5%) received at least 1 U allogeneic red blood cells (range, 10.9%-59.9%). When compared with patients who were not transfused, patients who received at least 1 U red blood cells were older (68 vs 64 years; P < .001), were women (41.5% vs 15.9%; P < .001), and had a lower body surface area (1.93 m

conclusionsThe results suggest that variation in center-level red blood cells transfusion cannot be explained by patient and procedural factors alone. Investigating organizational culture and programmatic infrastructure may be necessary to better understand variation in transfusion practices.

Indexed as

AgedCoronary Artery BypassCoronary Artery DiseaseDatabases, FactualErythrocyte TransfusionFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerioperative CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'RegistriesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsblood loss/surgicalbypass/cardiopulmonarycardiac surgical procedurescoronary artery bypasserythrocyte transfusionsperioperative care

Identifiers

PMID32631660
PMCPMC7959104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.