Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32631444›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2020

The development and cognitive testing of the positive outcomes HIV PROM: a brief novel patient-reported outcome measure for adults living with HIV.

K Bristowe, F E M Murtagh, P Clift, R James, J Josh, M Platt, J Whetham, E Nixon, F A Post, K McQuillan and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07229326 (POSITIVE OUTCOMES), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07229326 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

POSITIVE OUTCOMES: Driving up the Quality of HIV Outpatient Care Through the Routine Implementation of a PROM to Promote Patient-centredness

TypeobservationalSponsorKing's College LondonRan2026 to 2027Enrolled17,000ConditionsHIVArmsPOSITIVE OUTCOMES
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Can prediction models for hospital readmission be improved by incorporating patient-reported outcome measures? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Study on AIDS Self-Management Status and Its Influencing Factors.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures in interstitial lung disease: where to go from here?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

K BristoweKing's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK. Katherine.bristowe@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1809-217X
F E M MurtaghWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
P CliftKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
R JamesUniversity of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
J JoshUK-CAB, London, UK.
M PlattUK-CAB, London, UK.
J WhethamBrighton and Sussex University Hospitals Trust, Brighton, UK.
E NixonBrighton and Sussex University Hospitals Trust, Brighton, UK.
F A PostKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
K McQuillanSt James's Hospital Dublin and Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
C Ní CheallaighSt James's Hospital Dublin and Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
M KallPublic Health England, London, UK.
J AndersonHomerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
A K SullivanChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
R HardingKing's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GBChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBHomerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBPublic Health England · GBUniversity of Hull · GBUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople living with HIV experience burdensome multidimensional symptoms and concerns requiring person-centred care. Routine use of patient reported outcome measures can improve outcomes. There is no brief patient reported outcome measure (PROM) that currently reflects the breadth of concerns for people living with HIV. This study aimed to develop and cognitively test a brief novel patient reported outcome measure for use within routine adult HIV care- the "Positive Outcomes" HIV PROM.

methodsDevelopment followed the COSMIN taxonomy and guidance for relevance and comprehensiveness, and Rothrock guidance on development of valid patient reported outcome measures. The Positive Outcomes HIV PROM was developed by a steering group (people living with HIV, HIV professionals and health services researchers) using findings from a previously reported qualitative study of priority outcomes for people living with HIV. The prototype measure was cognitively tested with a purposive sample of people living with HIV.

resultsThe Positive Outcomes HIV PROM consists of 23 questions (22 structured, and one open question) informed by the priorities of key stakeholders (n = 28 people living with HIV, n = 21 HIV professionals and n = 8 HIV commissioners) to ensure face and content validity, and refined through cognitive testing (n = 6 people living with HIV). Cognitive testing demonstrated high levels of acceptability and accessibility.

conclusionsThe Positive Outcomes HIV PROM is the first brief patient reported outcome measure reflecting the diverse needs of people living with HIV designed specifically for use in the clinical setting to support patient assessment and care, and drive service quality improvement. It is derived from primary data on the priority outcomes for people living with HIV and is comprehensive and acceptable. Further psychometric testing is required to ensure reliability and responsiveness.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultAnti-HIV AgentsCognitionFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient-Centered CarePsychometricsQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsAnti-HIV AgentsHIVImplementationOutcomesPerson-centredPROMs

Identifiers

PMID32631444
PMCPMC7336444
OpenAlexW3039644755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.