ArticleJournal of translational medicine2020
Comprehensive molecular profiling of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the Chinese population and therapeutic experience.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as the first line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer: a pooled analysis of KEYNOTE-966 and TOPAZ-1 trails.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- PD-L1 Expression in Biliary Tract Cancer: Comparison Across Antibody Clones and Role as a Predictor of Response to Chemoimmunotherapy: A Meta-Analysis.JCO precision oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Glomangiosarcoma-like Anaplastic Transformation in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Novel Form of Heterologous Differentiation and a Systematic Review of Heterologous Element Prevalence.Endocrine pathology · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Adjuvant tislelizumab, lenvatinib, and capecitabine for resected biliary tract cancer: a prospective phase II trial.BMC medicine · 2026Trial
- FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement analysis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using DNA/RNA-based NGS and FISH.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Advancing Precision Medicine: The Role of Genetic Testing and Sequencing Technologies in Identifying Biological Markers for Rare Cancers.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Epidemiology and genomic features of biliary tract cancer and its unique features in Korea.Journal of liver cancer · 2025Article
- Establishment of two novel organoid lines from patients with combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma.Human cell · 2024Article
- Multi-Omics Classification of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2024Review
- Expert Consensus on Pathological Diagnosis of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (2022 version).Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2023Article
- Bufalin targeting CAMKK2 inhibits the occurrence and development of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma through Wnt/β-catenin signal pathway.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Genetic alterations ofOpen life sciences · 2023Article
- Investigating VEGF. miR-145-3p, and miR-101-3p Expression in Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022Article
- The Curious Case of the HepG2 Cell Line: 40 Years of Expertise.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Non-surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Review
- Development of Possible Next Line of Systemic Therapies for Gemcitabine-Resistant Biliary Tract Cancers: A Perspective from Clinical Trials.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Review
- Nomogram for Predicting Survival Post-Immune Therapy in Cholangiocarcinoma Based on Inflammatory Biomarkers.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe genomic alterations of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in the Chinese population have not been fully revealed. Molecular profiling may provide a reference for clinical management, especially targeted therapy.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted in 122 ICC patients. All patients' samples underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS), which analyzed 417 genes. The genetic characteristics, clinical management and therapeutic responses were analyzed.
resultsThe most commonly mutated genes were TP53 (34%), KRAS (25%) and ARID1A (17%). Targeted agents were used referring to molecular profiling, in combination with chemotherapy. Twenty-two patients with wild-type KRAS/NRAS/BRAF were treated with cetuximab. The disease control and response rates were 78% and 47%, respectively, which were higher than those achieved with chemotherapy alone (72% and 11%, P = 0.16). Fifty-four patients underwent anti-VEGF treatment with bevacizumab. The disease control and response rates were 85% and 60%, respectively. Better therapeutic efficiency (P = 0.001) and longer progression-free survival (PFS) were observed in the bevacizumab-treated group compared to chemotherapy alone group (15.4 and 6.7 months, respectively; P = 0.04). The PFS of ten patients who underwent hepatectomy after combined treatment with chemotherapy and bevacizumab was longer than that of 139 patients who underwent surgical treatment (28.9 vs 18.0 months, P = 0.03). Two patients (1.6%) had signatures of microsatellite instability (MSI-H), and both benefited from immunotherapy.
conclusionsThis study provides an overview of genetic alterations in Chinese ICC patients and indicates the potential clinical implications for NGS-based personalized therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.