Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32631430›Full record

ArticleNutrition journal2020

Development and validation of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire to assess dietary intake among Lebanese adults.

Mireille Harmouche-Karaki, Maya Mahfouz, Jawaher Obeyd, Pascale Salameh, Yara Mahfouz, Khalil Helou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Shifts in food consumption patterns in the Levant: a systematic review of the last six decades.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mireille Harmouche-KarakiDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmacy, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Lebanon B.P. 11-5076 - Riad el Solh, Beirut, 1107 2180, Lebanon. mireille.harmouche@usj.edu.lb.ORCID 0000-0002-8205-4955
Maya MahfouzDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmacy, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Lebanon B.P. 11-5076 - Riad el Solh, Beirut, 1107 2180, Lebanon.
Jawaher ObeydDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmacy, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Lebanon B.P. 11-5076 - Riad el Solh, Beirut, 1107 2180, Lebanon.
Pascale SalamehClinical and Epidemiological Research Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, Lebanese University, Hadath, Lebanon.
Yara MahfouzDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmacy, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Lebanon B.P. 11-5076 - Riad el Solh, Beirut, 1107 2180, Lebanon.
Khalil HelouDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmacy, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Lebanon B.P. 11-5076 - Riad el Solh, Beirut, 1107 2180, Lebanon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) is the most frequently used method to assess dietary intake in epidemiological studies evaluating diet-disease association. The objective of this study was to validate a FFQ for use among Lebanese adults by evaluating various facets of validity and reproducibility.

methodsThe quantitative 164-items FFQ was validated against the average of six 24-h dietary recalls (DRs) in a sample of 238 Lebanese adults. Reproducibility of the FFQ was assessed by administering it twice within 1 month' time interval.

resultsPositive statistically significant Pearson correlations were observed in most macro and micronutrients between the FFQ and the six 24-h DRs, ranging from 0.16 to 0.65, with two thirds of the correlation coefficients exceeding 0.3. Energy, gender, and age-adjusted statistically significant Pearson correlation coefficients ranged from 0.14 to 0.64, with two thirds of the coefficients exceeding 0.2. Intakes from the FFQ were mostly higher than those of the 24-h DRs. Mean percent difference between nutrient intakes from both dietary methods decreased remarkably after using energy-adjusted mean intakes. Values were acceptable to good for all macronutrients and several micronutrients. Cross-classification analysis revealed that around 64.3 to 83.9% of participants were classified into the same and adjacent quartile whereas grossly misclassified proportions ranged from 3.7 to 12.2%. Weighted kappa values ranged from 0.02 to 0.36 with most of them exceeding 0.2. In indirect validity analysis, key nutrient mean intakes estimated from the six 24-h DRs were significantly positively associated with tertiles of food groups derived from the FFQ. Bland Altman plots showed that the majority of data points fell within the limits of agreement (LOA) for all nutrients. As for reproducibility analysis, ICC values were all statistically significant ranging from 0.645 to 0.959 and Bland Altman plots confirmed these results.

conclusionsBased on various aspects of validity and reproducibility, and an extensive range of statistical tests, the present FFQ developed for a Lebanese community is an acceptable tool for dietary assessment and is useful for evaluating diet-disease associations in future studies.

Indexed as

DietEnergy IntakeAdultDiet RecordsDiet SurveysEatingHumansMicronutrientsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesMicronutrients24-h dietary recallFood frequency questionnaireLebanonMacronutrientsMicronutrientsNutrient intakeNutritional epidemiologyReproducibilityStatistical testsValidity

Identifiers

PMID32631430
PMCPMC7339409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.