Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32631362›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2020

Antipsychotic treatment experiences of people with bipolar I disorder: patient perspectives from an online survey.

Leona Bessonova, Dawn I Velligan, Peter J Weiden, Amy K O'Sullivan, Aaron Yarlas, Martha Bayliss, Nishtha Baranwal, Kaitlin Rychlec, Julia Carpenter-Conlin, Michael J Doane and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Leona BessonovaAlkermes, Inc., 852 Winter Street, Waltham, MA, USA. Leona.Bessonova@alkermes.com.
Dawn I VelliganThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Peter J WeidenAlkermes, Inc., 852 Winter Street, Waltham, MA, USA.
Amy K O'SullivanAlkermes, Inc., 852 Winter Street, Waltham, MA, USA.
Aaron YarlasOptum, 1301 Atwood Avenue, Johnston, RI, USA.
Martha BaylissOptum, 1301 Atwood Avenue, Johnston, RI, USA.
Nishtha BaranwalOptum, 1301 Atwood Avenue, Johnston, RI, USA.
Kaitlin RychlecOptum, 1301 Atwood Avenue, Johnston, RI, USA.
Julia Carpenter-ConlinAlkermes, Inc., 852 Winter Street, Waltham, MA, USA.
Michael J DoaneAlkermes, Inc., 852 Winter Street, Waltham, MA, USA.
Martha SajatovicUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Alkermes (United States) · USOptum (United States) · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral antipsychotic (AP) medications are frequently prescribed to people with bipolar I disorder (BD-I). A cross-sectional online survey examined the experiences of people living with BD-I with a history of recent AP use.

methodsAdults with self-reported physician-diagnosed BD-I (N = 200) who received oral APs during the prior year completed a survey on AP-related experiences, including side effects and their perceived burden on social functioning, adherence, and work. Items also assessed preferences for trade-offs (balancing symptom management and side effects) when considering a hypothetical new AP. The perceived impact of specific, prevalent side effects on adherence, work, and preferences for a hypothetical AP were also examined. Analyses were descriptive.

resultsThe survey sample had a mean age of 43.2 (SD = 12.4) years, was 60% female, and 31% nonwhite. Almost all participants (98%) had experienced AP side effects. Common self-reported side effects were feeling drowsy or tired (83%), lack of emotion (79%), anxiety (79%), dry mouth (76%), and weight gain (76%). Weight gain was cited as the most bothersome side effect, rated by most participants (68%) as "very" or "extremely bothersome." Nearly half of participants (49%) reported that AP side effects negatively impacted their job performance; almost all (92%) reported that side effects - most commonly anxiety and lack of emotion - negatively impacted social relationships (e.g., family or romantic partners). The most commonly-reported reason for stopping AP use was dislike of side effects (48%). Side effects most likely to lead to stopping or taking less of AP treatment included "feeling like a 'zombie'" (29%), feeling drowsy or tired (25%), and weight gain (24%). When considering a hypothetical new AP, the most common side effects participants wanted to avoid included AP-induced anxiety (50%), weight gain (48%), and "feeling like a 'zombie'" (47%).

conclusionsSide effects of APs were both common and bothersome, and impacted social functioning, adherence, and work. Findings highlight the prevailing unmet need for new APs with more favorable benefit-risk profiles.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsBipolar DisorderAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesWeight GainAntipsychotic AgentsAdherenceAntipsychoticBipolar disorderBipolar I disorderPreferenceSide effects

Identifiers

PMID32631362
PMCPMC7371473
OpenAlexW3038770835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.