Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32631256›Full record

ReviewBMC bioinformatics2020

MASS: predict the global qualities of individual protein models using random forests and novel statistical potentials.

Tong Liu, Zheng Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tong LiuDepartment of Computer Science, University of Miami, 1365 Memorial Drive, P.O. Box 248154, Coral Gables, FL, 33124, USA.
Zheng WangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Miami, 1365 Memorial Drive, P.O. Box 248154, Coral Gables, FL, 33124, USA. zheng.wang@miami.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3892-6151
University of Miami · US

Funding

Measure and Classify the Structure and Function of Genome Topological DomainsR15GM120650 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI · PI SUNG, ANDREW H. · 2016 to 2016
$444k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM120650NIGMS NIH HHS R15GM120650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProtein model quality assessment (QA) is an essential procedure in protein structure prediction. QA methods can predict the qualities of protein models and identify good models from decoys. Clustering-based methods need a certain number of models as input. However, if a pool of models are not available, methods that only need a single model as input are indispensable.

resultsWe developed MASS, a QA method to predict the global qualities of individual protein models using random forests and various novel energy functions. We designed six novel energy functions or statistical potentials that can capture the structural characteristics of a protein model, which can also be used in other protein-related bioinformatics research. MASS potentials demonstrated higher importance than the energy functions of RWplus, GOAP, DFIRE and Rosetta when the scores they generated are used as machine learning features. MASS outperforms almost all of the four CASP11 top-performing single-model methods for global quality assessment in terms of all of the four evaluation criteria officially used by CASP, which measure the abilities to assign relative and absolute scores, identify the best model from decoys, and distinguish between good and bad models. MASS has also achieved comparable performances with the leading QA methods in CASP12 and CASP13.

conclusionsMASS and the source code for all MASS potentials are publicly available at http://dna.cs.miami.edu/MASS/ .

Indexed as

Computational BiologyModels, MolecularProteinsProteinsProtein energy potentialsProtein model quality assessmentRandom forestsSingle-model QA

Identifiers

PMID32631256
PMCPMC7336608
OpenAlexW3039023400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.