Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32631223›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2020

How being synanthropic affects the gut bacteriome and mycobiome: comparison of two mouse species with contrasting ecologies.

Barbora Bendová, Jaroslav Piálek, Ľudovít Ďureje, Lucie Schmiedová, Dagmar Čížková, Jean-Francois Martin, Jakub Kreisinger

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advancing the study of microbial symbionts of amphibians and reptiles.Frontiers in amphibian and reptile science · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Cynomolgus Macaque Intestinal Mycobiome Is Dominated by theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Intestinal Microecology of Mice Exposed to TiOFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbora BendováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav PiálekStudenec Research Facility, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
Ľudovít ĎurejeStudenec Research Facility, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
Lucie SchmiedováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Dagmar ČížkováStudenec Research Facility, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jean-Francois MartinCBGP, Montpellier SupAgro, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, Univ Montpellier, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France.
Jakub KreisingerDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. jakubkreisinger@seznam.cz.ORCID 0000-0001-9375-9814
Czech Academy of Sciences · CZCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRCharles University · CZ

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 18-17796YGrantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova (CZ) 1501218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe vertebrate gastrointestinal tract is colonised by microbiota that have a major effect on the host's health, physiology and phenotype. Once introduced into captivity, however, the gut microbial composition of free-living individuals can change dramatically. At present, little is known about gut microbial changes associated with adaptation to a synanthropic lifestyle in commensal species, compared with their non-commensal counterparts. Here, we compare the taxonomic composition and diversity of bacterial and fungal communities across three gut sections in synanthropic house mouse (Mus musculus) and a closely related non-synanthropic mound-building mouse (Mus spicilegus).

resultsUsing Illumina sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA amplicons, we found higher bacterial diversity in M. spicilegus and detected 11 bacterial operational taxonomic units with significantly different proportions. Notably, abundance of Oscillospira, which is typically higher in lean or outdoor pasturing animals, was more abundant in non-commensal M. spicilegus. ITS2-based barcoding revealed low diversity and high uniformity of gut fungi in both species, with the genus Kazachstania clearly dominant.

conclusionsThough differences in gut bacteria observed in the two species can be associated with their close association with humans, changes due to a move from commensalism to captivity would appear to have caused larger shifts in microbiota.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaDNA, RibosomalEcologyFecesFungiHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMiceMicrobiotaMycobiomePhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SEvolutionMetabarcodingMicrobiomeMuridaeSteppe mouseSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID32631223
PMCPMC7336484
OpenAlexW3039886366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.