Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32631219›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

RNA-Seq of three free-living flatworm species suggests rapid evolution of reproduction-related genes.

Jeremias N Brand, R Axel W Wiberg, Robert Pjeta, Philip Bertemes, Christian Beisel, Peter Ladurner, Lukas Schärer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeremias N BrandDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoological Institute, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, 4051, Basel, Switzerland. jeremias.brand@unibas.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6126-8279
R Axel W WibergDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoological Institute, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Robert PjetaInstitute of Zoology and Center of Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Philip BertemesInstitute of Zoology and Center of Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christian BeiselDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, Basel, Switzerland.
Peter LadurnerInstitute of Zoology and Center of Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Lukas SchärerDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoological Institute, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Universität Innsbruck · ATUniversity of Basel · CHETH Zurich · CH

Funding

Austrian Science Fund P30347Austrian Science Fund FWF P 30347Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg 13569708Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 310030_184916Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 31003A_162543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe genus Macrostomum consists of small free-living flatworms and contains Macrostomum lignano, which has been used in investigations of ageing, stem cell biology, bioadhesion, karyology, and sexual selection in hermaphrodites. Two types of mating behaviour occur within this genus. Some species, including M. lignano, mate via reciprocal copulation, where, in a single mating, both partners insert their male copulatory organ into the female storage organ and simultaneously donate and receive sperm. Other species mate via hypodermic insemination, where worms use a needle-like copulatory organ to inject sperm into the tissue of the partner. These contrasting mating behaviours are associated with striking differences in sperm and copulatory organ morphology. Here we expand the genomic resources within the genus to representatives of both behaviour types and investigate whether genes vary in their rate of evolution depending on their putative function.

resultsWe present de novo assembled transcriptomes of three Macrostomum species, namely M. hystrix, a close relative of M. lignano that mates via hypodermic insemination, M. spirale, a more distantly related species that mates via reciprocal copulation, and finally M. pusillum, which represents a clade that is only distantly related to the other three species and also mates via hypodermic insemination. We infer 23,764 sets of homologous genes and annotate them using experimental evidence from M. lignano. Across the genus, we identify 521 gene families with conserved patterns of differential expression between juvenile vs. adult worms and 185 gene families with a putative expression in the testes that are restricted to the two reciprocally mating species. Further, we show that homologs of putative reproduction-related genes have a higher protein divergence across the four species than genes lacking such annotations and that they are more difficult to identify across the four species, indicating that these genes evolve more rapidly, while genes involved in neoblast function are more conserved.

conclusionsThis study improves the genus Macrostomum as a model system, by providing resources for the targeted investigation of gene function in a broad range of species. And we, for the first time, show that reproduction-related genes evolve at an accelerated rate in flatworms.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsGenes, HelminthHelminth ProteinsIn Situ HybridizationPhylogenyPlatyhelminthsReproductionRNA-SeqTranscriptomeHelminth ProteinsDifferential expressionOrthologsPlatyhelminthesRate of evolutionRegenerationRNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID32631219
PMCPMC7336406
OpenAlexW3039957564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.