Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32631215›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

DUGMO: tool for the detection of unknown genetically modified organisms with high-throughput sequencing data for pure bacterial samples.

Julie Hurel, Sophie Schbath, Stéphanie Bougeard, Mathieu Rolland, Mauro Petrillo, Fabrice Touzain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. New developments in biotechnology applied to microorganisms.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julie HurelANSES, Laboratoire de Ploufragan, GVB unit, 22440, Ploufragan, France.
Sophie SchbathUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MaIAGE, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Stéphanie BougeardANSES, Laboratoire de Ploufragan, EPISABE unit, 22440, Ploufragan, France.
Mathieu RollandANSES, Laboratoire de la santé des végétaux, 49000, Angers, France.
Mauro PetrilloEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Fabrice TouzainANSES, Laboratoire de Ploufragan, GVB unit, 22440, Ploufragan, France. fabrice.touzain@anses.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1103-2425

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe European Community has adopted very restrictive policies regarding the dissemination and use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). In fact, a maximum threshold of 0.9% of contaminating GMOs is tolerated for a "GMO-free" label. In recent years, imports of undescribed GMOs have been detected. Their sequences are not described and therefore not detectable by conventional approaches, such as PCR.

resultsWe developed DUGMO, a bioinformatics pipeline for the detection of genetically modified (GM) bacteria, including unknown GM bacteria, based on Illumina paired-end sequencing data. The method is currently focused on the detection of GM bacteria with - possibly partial - transgenes in pure bacterial samples. In the preliminary steps, coding sequences (CDSs) are aligned through two successive BLASTN against the host pangenome with relevant tuned parameters to discriminate CDSs belonging to the wild type genome (wgCDS) from potential GM coding sequences (pgmCDSs). Then, Bray-Curtis distances are calculated between the wgCDS and each pgmCDS, based on the difference of genomic vocabulary. Finally, two machine learning methods, namely the Random Forest and Generalized Linear Model, are carried out to target true GM CDS(s), based on six variables including Bray-Curtis distances and GC content. Tests carried out on a GM Bacillus subtilis showed 25 positive CDSs corresponding to the chloramphenicol resistance gene and CDSs of the inserted plasmids. On a wild type B. subtilis, no false positive sequences were detected.

conclusionDUGMO detects exogenous CDS, truncated, fused or highly mutated wild CDSs in high-throughput sequencing data, and was shown to be efficient at detecting GM sequences, but it might also be employed for the identification of recent horizontal gene transfers.

Indexed as

BacteriaComputational BiologyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansOrganisms, Genetically ModifiedPolymerase Chain ReactionBacteriaDetectionIllumina sequencing dataMachine learningUnknown GMO

Identifiers

PMID32631215
PMCPMC7336441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.