Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32631142›Full record

ReviewStatistical methods in medical research2021

Mixed-effects models for the design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: An overview.

Fan Li, James P Hughes, Karla Hemming, Monica Taljaard, Edward R Melnick, Patrick J Heagerty

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Statistical methods in medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Burden and care time for dementia caregivers in the LIVE@Home.Path trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fan LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6183-1893
James P HughesDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Karla HemmingInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2226-6550
Monica TaljaardClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Edward R MelnickDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Patrick J HeagertyDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
EMBED: Pragmatic trial of user-centered clinical decision support to implement EMergency department-initiated BuprenorphinE for opioid use DisorderUH3DA047003 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI D'ONOFRIO, GAIL, MELNICK, EDWARD ROBERT · 2019 to 2022
$7.2M
Department of Health SRF-2017-10-002NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDA NIH HHS UH3 DA047003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stepped wedge cluster randomized design has received increasing attention in pragmatic clinical trials and implementation science research. The key feature of the design is the unidirectional crossover of clusters from the control to intervention conditions on a staggered schedule, which induces confounding of the intervention effect by time. The stepped wedge design first appeared in the Gambia hepatitis study in the 1980s. However, the statistical model used for the design and analysis was not formally introduced until 2007 in an article by Hussey and Hughes. Since then, a variety of mixed-effects model extensions have been proposed for the design and analysis of these trials. In this article, we explore these extensions under a unified perspective. We provide a general model representation and regard various model extensions as alternative ways to characterize the secular trend, intervention effect, as well as sources of heterogeneity. We review the key model ingredients and clarify their implications for the design and analysis. The article serves as an entry point to the evolving statistical literatures on stepped wedge designs.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalResearch DesignCluster AnalysisCross-Over StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCluster randomized trialsgroup-randomized trialsheterogeneityintraclass correlation coefficientmixed-effects regressionpragmatic clinical trialssample size calculation

Identifiers

PMID32631142
PMCPMC7785651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.