Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32631121›Full record

ArticleMedical teacher2020

Pride and prejudice - What can we learn from peer review?

Helen Le Sueur, Arianna Dagliati, Iain Buchan, Anthony D Whetton, Glen P Martin, Tim Dornan, Nophar Geifman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical teacher, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Helen Le SueurCentre for Health Informatics, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Arianna DagliatiCentre for Health Informatics, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Iain BuchanDepartment of Public Health and Policy, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Anthony D WhettonStoller Biomarker Discovery Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Glen P MartinCentre for Health Informatics, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Tim DornanCentre for Medical Education, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Nophar GeifmanCentre for Health Informatics, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2956-6676

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N00583X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Peer ReviewPrejudiceEmotionsPeer Review, ResearchResearch Reportbiasfeedbackmachine learningPeer reviewsentimentsubgroup discovery

Identifiers

PMID32631121
PMCPMC7497287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.