Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32631004›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2020

Relationship Between Final Visual Acuity and Optical Coherence Tomography Findings in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Undergoing Anti-VEGF Therapy

Seher Eraslan, Özlem Yıldırım, Özer Dursun, Erdem Dinç, Gülhan Orekici Temel

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Indicators of Visual Prognosis in Diabetic Macular Oedema.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seher EraslanNevşehir State Hospital, Clinic of Ophthalmology, Nevşehir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2928-7159
Özlem YıldırımMersin University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Mersin, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8901-4190
Özer DursunMersin University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Mersin, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4216-0814
Erdem DinçMersin University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Mersin, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3462-1502
Gülhan Orekici TemelMersin University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Mersin, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2835-6979
Mersin Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the prevalence of findings in optical coherence tomography (OCT) sections before intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), and to evaluate the relationship between these findings and final visual acuity and number of injections. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 296 eyes of 191 patients (104 male, 87 female) who started intravitreal ranibizumab treatment after being diagnosed with DME in the retina unit between January 2013 and April 2017 were included the study. Spectral domain OCT findings at the time of presentation such as presence of serous macular detachment (SD), vitreomacular traction (VMT), and epiretinal membrane (ERM) were recorded. In addition, the regularity of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) and inner retinal layers was also studied. Results: The mean central retinal thickness measured in SD-OCT was 449±81 μm before treatment and 350±96 μm after treatment (p<0.001). SD was detected in 155 eyes (52.4%), ERM in 67 eyes (22.6%), and VMT in 9 eyes (3%). Thirty eyes (10.1%) had disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL) and 54 eyes (18.2%) had EZ deterioration. The presence of ERM, EZ irregularity, and DRIL were associated with significantly lower final visual acuity (p<0.0001), while there was no relationship between pre-treatment SD and final visual acuity (p=0.11). Injection number was higher in eyes with SD and ERM compared to those without, but this difference was statistically significant only in the presence of SD (p=0.01 and p=0.59, respectively). There was no difference in injection number according to EZ irregularity or presence of DRIL. Conclusion: The coexistence of SD with DME was associated with increased need for treatment but not with final visual acuity. EZ irregularities, DRIL, and ERM are findings that negatively affect visual acuity.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsDiabetic RetinopathyFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiHumansMacula LuteaMacular EdemaMaleMiddle AgedRanibizumabRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeAngiogenesis InhibitorsRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Aanti-VEGF treatmentDiabetic macular edemaoptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID32631004
PMCPMC7338745
OpenAlexW3039406523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.