Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32630765›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Real-World Goal Setting and Use of Outcome Measures According to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A European Survey of Physical Therapy Practice in Multiple Sclerosis.

Kamila Řasová, Patrícia Martinková, Bernadita Soler, Jenny Freeman, Davide Cattaneo, Johanna Jonsdottir, Tori Smedal, Anders Romberg, Thomas Henze, Carme Santoyo-Medina and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Human Functioning: Developments and Grand Challenges.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2020
    Article
  6. Guest Editorial.International journal of MS care
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Kamila ŘasováDepartment of Rehabilitation, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 108 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Patrícia MartinkováDepartment of Statistical Modelling, Institute of Computer Science of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 07 Prague, Czech Republic.
Bernadita SolerNeurology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 3580000, Chile.
Jenny FreemanFaculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Devon PL6 8BH, UK.
Davide CattaneoIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Larice Lab, 20148 Milan, Italy.
Johanna JonsdottirIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Larice Lab, 20148 Milan, Italy.
Tori SmedalNorwegian Multiple Sclerosis Competence Centre, Department of Neurology and Department of Physiotherapy, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
Anders RombergPhysiotherapy, Masku Neurological Rehabilitation Centre, 21250 Masku, Finland.
Thomas HenzeSpecialist Practice in Neurology, 93059 Regensburg, Germany.
Carme Santoyo-MedinaNeurology-Neuroimmunology Department, Neurorehabilitation Unit, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Peter FeysREVAL, Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium.
Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · ITCharles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences · CZHasselt University · BEHaukeland University Hospital · NOPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLUniversity of Plymouth · GBVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Goal setting is a core component of physical therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS). It is unknown whether and to what extent goals are set at different levels of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), and whether, and to which, standardized outcome measures are used in real life for evaluation at the different ICF levels. Our aim was to describe the real-world use of goal setting and outcome measures in Europe. An online cross-sectional survey, completed by 212 physical therapists (PTs) specialized in MS from 26 European countries, was conducted. Differences between European regions and relationships between goals and assessments were analyzed. PTs regularly set goals, but did not always apply the Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timed (SMART) criteria. Regions did not differ in the range of activities assessed, but in goals set (e.g., Western and Northern regions set significantly more goals regarding leisure and work) and outcome measures used (e.g., the Berg Balance Scale was more frequently used in Northern regions). Quality of life was not routinely assessed, despite being viewed as an important therapy goal. Discrepancies existed both in goal setting and assessment across European regions. ICF assists in understanding these discrepancies and in guiding improved health-care for the future.

Indexed as

International Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthPhysical Therapy ModalitiesCross-Sectional StudiesDisability EvaluationEuropeGoalsHumansMultiple SclerosisOutcome Assessment, Health CareSurveys and Questionnairescluster analysisEuropegoalsinternational classification of functioning, disability and healthmeasuresmultiple sclerosisphysical therapyquestionnaire survey

Identifiers

PMID32630765
PMCPMC7369767
OpenAlexW3038216810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.