ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020
In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Immune Response of Jellyfish Collagen Scaffolds and its Suitability for Bone Regeneration.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Growth Factors in Oral Tissue Engineering: New Perspectives and Current Therapeutic Options.BioMed research international · 2021Pooled it
- Evaluation of angiogenic, osteogenic, and antimicrobial potential of novel type X collagen-derived GBR membrane: an in vivo preliminary study.Odontology · 2026Article
- Treatment of femoral defects in rats with collagen and elastin polymers combined with hydroxyapatite and bone morphogenetic protein.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Harnessing marine-derived materials for therapeutics innovations: Advances in biomaterials from the ocean.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Jellyfish collagen ameliorates collagen-induced arthritis CIA in Sprague Dawley rats by modulating inflammatory mediators by inhibiting the NF κB and JAK STAT pathways.Open veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Jellyfish Collagen in the Mediterranean Spotlight: Transforming Challenges into Opportunities.Marine drugs · 2025Review
- Optimizing the Handling of Cancellous Bone Grafts to Preserve Their Osteogenic Potential in Craniofacial Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Innovation in Osteogenesis Activation: Role of Marine-Derived Materials in Bone Regeneration.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Advances in the application and research of biomaterials in promoting bone repair and regeneration through immune modulation.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Jellyfish Collagen Grafted with Hydroxybutyl Chitosan and Protocatechuic Acid Adhesive Sponge with Antibacterial Activity for Rapid Hemostasis.ACS omega · 2025Article
- How Significant Are Marine Invertebrate Collagens? Exploring Trends in Research and Innovation.Marine drugs · 2024Review
- Review
- Characterization of Collagen from Jellyfish Aurelia aurita and Investigation of Biomaterials Potentials.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Amine-reactive crosslinking enhances type 0 collagen hydrogel properties for regenerative medicine.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- The influence of different crosslinking agents onto the physical properties, integration behavior and immune response of collagen-based barrier membranes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Extracellular matrix type 0: From ancient collagen lineage to a versatile product pipeline - JellaGel™.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- Recent Advances in Bioengineering Bone Revascularization Based on Composite Materials Comprising Hydroxyapatite.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Resistance to Degradation of Silk Fibroin Hydrogels Exposed to Neuroinflammatory Environments.Polymers · 2023Article
- Dynamic degradation patterns of porous polycaprolactone/β-tricalcium phosphate composites orchestrate macrophage responses and immunoregulatory bone regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- Suitability ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Jellyfish collagen, which can be defined as "collagen type 0" due to its homogeneity to the mammalian types I, II, III, V, and IX and its batch-to-batch consistent producibility, is of special interest for different medical applications related to (bone) tissue regeneration as an alternative to mammalian collagen-based biomaterials. However, no in vivo studies regarding the induction of M1- and M2-macrophages and their time-dependent ration as well as the analysis of the bone regeneration capacity of jellyfish collagen scaffolds have been conducted until now. Thus, the goal of this study was to determine the nature of the immune response to jellyfish collagen scaffolds and their bone healing capacities. Two in vivo studies using established implantation models, i.e., the subcutaneous and the calvarian implantation model in Wistar rats, were conducted. Furthermore, specialized histological, histopathological, and histomorphometrical methods have been used. As a control biomaterial, a collagen scaffold, originating from porcine pericardium, which has already been stated as biocompatible, was used for the subcutaneous study. The results of the present study show that jellyfish collagen scaffolds are nearly completely resorbed until day 60 post implantation by stepwise integration within the subcutaneous connective tissue mediated mainly by macrophages and single multinucleated giant cells. Interestingly, the degradation process ended in a vessel rich connective tissue that is understood to be an optimal basis for tissue regeneration. The study results showed an overall weaker immune response to jellyfish collagen than to porcine pericardium matrices by the induction of significantly lower numbers of macrophages together with a more balanced occurrence of M1- and M2-macrophages. However, both collagen-based biomaterials induced balanced numbers of both macrophage subtypes, which supports their good biocompatibility. Moreover, the histomorphometrical results for the calvarial implantation of the jellyfish scaffolds revealed an average of 46.20% de novo bone formation at day 60, which was significantly higher compared to the control group. Thereby, the jellyfish collagen scaffolds induced also significantly higher numbers of anti-inflammatory macrophages within the bony implantation beds. Altogether, the results show that the jellyfish collagen scaffolds allowed for a directed integration behavior, which is assumed to be in accordance with the concept of Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR). Furthermore, the jellyfish collagen scaffolds induced a long-term anti-inflammatory macrophage response and an optimal vascularization pattern within their implant beds, thus showing excellent biocompatibility and (bone) tissue healing properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.