Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32630432›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2020

The Mechanical and Physical Properties of 3D-Printed Materials Composed of ABS-ZnO Nanocomposites and ABS-ZnO Microcomposites.

Nectarios Vidakis, Markos Petousis, Athena Maniadi, Emmanuel Koudoumas, George Kenanakis, Cosmin Romanitan, Oana Tutunaru, Mirela Suchea, John Kechagias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nectarios VidakisMechanical Engineering Department, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71004 Heraklion, Greece.
Markos PetousisMechanical Engineering Department, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71004 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1312-7898
Athena ManiadiDepartment of Materials Science and Technology, University of Crete, 70013 Heraklion Crete, Greece.
Emmanuel KoudoumasDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Estavromenos, 71004 Heraklion, Greece.
George KenanakisInstitute of Electronic Structure and Laser, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, 70013 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-5843-3712
Cosmin RomanitanNational Institute for Research and Development in Microtechnologies (IMT-Bucharest), 077190 Bucharest, Romania.
Oana TutunaruNational Institute for Research and Development in Microtechnologies (IMT-Bucharest), 077190 Bucharest, Romania.
Mirela SucheaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Estavromenos, 71004 Heraklion, Greece.
John KechagiasGeneral Department, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5768-4285

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to expand the mechanical and physical capabilities of 3D-printed structures fabricated via commercially available 3D printers, nanocomposite and microcomposite filaments were produced via melt extrusion, 3D-printed and evaluated. The scope of this work is to fabricate physically and mechanically improved nanocomposites or microcomposites for direct commercial or industrial implementation while enriching the existing literature with the methodology applied. Zinc Oxide nanoparticles (ZnO nano) and Zinc Oxide micro-sized particles (ZnO micro) were dispersed, in various concentrations, in Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) matrices and printable filament of ~1.75mm was extruded. The composite filaments were employed in a commercial 3D printer for tensile and flexion specimens' production, according to international standards. Results showed a 14% increase in the tensile strength at 5% wt. concentration in both nanocomposite and microcomposite materials, when compared to pure ABS specimens. Furthermore, a 15.3% increase in the flexural strength was found in 0.5% wt. for ABS/ZnO nano, while an increase of 17% was found on 5% wt. ABS/ZnO micro. Comparing the two composites, it was found that the ABS/ZnO microcomposite structures had higher overall mechanical strength over ABS/ZnO nanostructures.

Indexed as

3D printingacrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)additive manufacturingflexuralfused filament fabrication (FFF)nanocompositesstrengthtensile

Identifiers

PMID32630432
PMCPMC7345739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.