Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32630430›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Automated Nociceptive Withdrawal Reflex Measurements Reveal Normal Reflex Thresholds and Augmented Pain Ratings in Patients with Fibromyalgia.

Johannes Ydrefors, Tomas Karlsson, Ulrika Wentzel Olausson, Bijar Ghafouri, Ann-Charlotte Johansson, Håkan Olausson, Björn Gerdle, Saad S Nagi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Johannes YdreforsDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Linköping University, 58185 Linköping, Sweden.
Tomas KarlssonInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ulrika Wentzel OlaussonPain and Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 58185 Linköping, Sweden.
Bijar GhafouriPain and Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 58185 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6396-5104
Ann-Charlotte JohanssonCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Linköping University, 58185 Linköping, Sweden.
Håkan OlaussonDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Linköping University, 58185 Linköping, Sweden.
Björn GerdlePain and Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 58185 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4316-1264
Saad S NagiDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Linköping University, 58185 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8773-8232
Linköping University · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

County Council of Östergötland (Research-ALF) LIO-700931County Council of Östergötland (Research-ALF) LIO-900631Vetenskapsrådet 2018-02470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) is used to probe spinal cord excitability in chronic pain states. Here, we used an automated and unbiased procedure for determining the NWR threshold and compared the reflex thresholds and corresponding pain ratings in a well-characterized cohort of fibromyalgia (

Indexed as

chronic painelectromyographyfibromyalgianociceptive withdrawal reflexsensitization

Identifiers

PMID32630430
PMCPMC7356211
OpenAlexW3037456460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.