Seeing the Finish Line? Retirement Perceptions and Wellbeing among Social Workers.

John Moriarty, Patricia Gillen, John Mallett, Jill Manthorpe, Heike Schröder, Paula McFadden

Open access · goldAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John MoriartyCentre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT96AX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8280-973X

Patricia GillenSouthern Health and Social Care Trust, Rosedale, Moyallen Road, Gilford BT63 5JX, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4097-4355

John MallettSchool of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7539-3329

Jill ManthorpeNIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.

Heike SchröderSchool of Management, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT95EE, UK.

Paula McFaddenSchool of Applied Social and Policy Sciences, University of Ulster at Magee, Londonderry BT487JL, UK.

University of Ulster · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Planning for future health and social services (HSS) workforces must be informed by an understanding of how workers view their work within the context of their life and the challenges they will face across the course of life. There is a range of policies and provisions that states and organisations can adopt to create sustainable careers, support wellbeing at work, and extend working lives where appropriate, but the potential impact of these policies on the make-up of the workforce remains under investigation. This paper makes the case that service planners need to appreciate complex interplay between wellbeing and career decisions when planning the future workforce. It makes use of a recent survey of United Kingdom (UK) social workers (

Indexed as

EmploymentRetirementSocial WorkersHumansQuality of LifeUnited Kingdomextended working lifemental healthorganisational policyretirementworkplace

Identifiers

PMID32630072

DOI10.3390/ijerph17134722

PMCPMC7369794

OpenAlexW3040671500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.