ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020
New Antithrombotic Drugs in Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of novel antithrombotic agents for COVID-19: Systematic summary of ongoing randomized controlled trials.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2021Pooled it
- Risk factors and predictive model for mortality in acute myocardial infarction with ventricular septal rupture at high altitudes.World journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- The Benefits of a Comprehensive Cardiac Rehabilitation Program for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Follow-Up Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Parenteral P2YJournal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- Bleeding avoidance strategies in percutaneous coronary intervention.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2022Review
- Antithrombotic Therapy Improves ICU Mortality of Septic Patients with Peripheral Vascular Disease.International journal of clinical practice · 2022Article
- Cangrelor: Clinical Data, Contemporary Use, and Future Perspectives.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Review
- Platelet Proteomes, Pathways, and Phenotypes as Informants of Vascular Wellness and Disease.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2021Review
- Diagnosis and Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome: What is New and Why? Insight From the 2020 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, much progress has been made in the field of antithrombotic drugs in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treatment, as reflected by the introduction of the more potent P2Y12-inhibitors prasugrel and ticagrelor, and novel forms of concomitant anticoagulation, such as fondaparinux and bivalirudin. However, despite substantial improvements in contemporary ACS treatment, there remains residual ischemic risk in this group and hence the need for even more effective antithrombotic drugs, while balancing antithrombotic efficacy against bleeding risk. This review discusses recently introduced and currently developed antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs in ACS treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.