Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32629953›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program.

Kara P Wiseman, Lindsay Hauser, Connie Clark, Onyiyoza Odumosu, Neely Dahl, Jennifer Peregoy, Christina W Sheffield, Robert C Klesges, Roger T Anderson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tobacco Use and Treatment among Cancer Survivors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kara P WisemanDepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Lindsay HauserCancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Connie ClarkCancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Onyiyoza OdumosuCancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Neely DahlCancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Jennifer PeregoyCancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Christina W SheffieldCancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Robert C KlesgesDepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Roger T AndersonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

Women's Oncology Program - WONP30CA044579 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Thomas P. Loughran · 1987 to 2026
$72.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA044579-24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tobacco use after a cancer diagnosis can increase risk of disease recurrence, increase the likelihood of a second primary cancer, and negatively impact treatment efficacy. The implementation of system-wide comprehensive tobacco cessation in the oncology setting has historically been low, with over half of cancer clinicians reporting that they do not treat or provide a referral to cessation resources. This quality improvement study evaluated the procedures for assessing and documenting tobacco use among cancer survivors and referring current smokers to cessation resources at the University of Virginia Cancer Center. Process mapping revealed 20 gaps across two major domains: electronic health record (EHR), and personnel barriers. The top identified priority was inconsistent documentation of tobacco use status as it impacted several downstream gaps. Eleven of the 20 gaps were deemed a high priority, and all were addressed during the implementation of the resulting Tobacco Treatment Program. Prioritized gaps were addressed using a combination of provider training, modifications to clinical workflow, and EHR modifications. Since implementation of solutions, the number of unique survivors receiving cessation treatment has increased from 284 survivors receiving cessation support during Year 1 of the initiative to 487 in Year 3. The resulting Tobacco Treatment Program provides a systematic, personalized, and sustainable comprehensive cessation program that optimizes the multifaceted workflow of the Cancer Center and has the potential to reduce tobacco use in a population most in need of cessation support.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementTobacco Use CessationTobacco Use DisorderHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNicotianaCancer survivorshipprocess mappingquality improvementsmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID32629953
PMCPMC7369775
OpenAlexW3040526039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.