Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32629925›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

New Oral Surgery Materials for Bone Reconstruction-A Comparison of Five Bone Substitute Materials for Dentoalveolar Augmentation.

Marcin Kozakiewicz, Tomasz Wach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Measures of Corticalization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marcin KozakiewiczDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University in Lodz, Pl. Hallera 1, 90-647 Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9200-2828
Tomasz WachDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University in Lodz, Pl. Hallera 1, 90-647 Łódź, Poland.

Funding

Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lodzi 503-51-001-17Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lodzi 503-51-001-18Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lodzi 503-51-001-19-00Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lodzi 503-51-002-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents a comparison of bone replacement materials in terms of their ability to produce living bone image at the place of their implantation. Five bone replacement materials are compared (Osteovit-porous collagen, Cerasorb Foam-collagen scaffolding of synthetic β tricalcium phosphate, Osbone-synthetic hydroxyapatite, Endobone-deproteinized bovine-derived cancellous bone hydroxyapatite, and Cerasorb-synthetic β tricalcium phosphate). Intraoral radiographs are taken immediately after implantation and 12 months later. The texture analysis was performed to assess (texture index, TI) the level of structure chaos (entropy) in relation to the presence of longitudinal elements visible in radiographs (run length emphasis moment). The reference ratio of the chaotic trabecular pattern (Entropy) to the number of longitudinal structures, i.e., trabeculae (LngREmph), is 176:100 (i.e., 1.76 ± 0.28). Radiological homogeneity immediately after the implantation procedure is a result of the similar shape of its particles (Osbone, Endobone and Cerasorb) or radiolucency (Osteovit, Cerasorb Foam). The particles visible in radiographs were similar in the LngREmph parameters applied to the reference bone, but not in the co-occurrence matrix features. The TI for Osteovit during a 12-month follow-up period changed from 1.55 ± 0.26 to 1.48 ± 0.26 (

Indexed as

alveolar crestaugmentationbone substitute materialintraoral radiographtexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID32629925
PMCPMC7372326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.