Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32629847›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Instrument to Identify Food Neophobia in Brazilian Children by Their Caregivers.

Priscila Claudino de Almeida, Beatriz Philippi Rosane, Eduardo Yoshio Nakano, Ivana Aragão Lira Vasconcelos, Renata Puppin Zandonadi, Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Priscila Claudino de AlmeidaGraduate Program in Human Nutrition, University of Brasília, 70910-900 Brasília, Brazil.
Beatriz Philippi RosaneGraduate Program in Human Nutrition, University of Brasília, 70910-900 Brasília, Brazil.
Eduardo Yoshio NakanoDepartment of Statistics, University of Brasília, 70910-900 Brasília, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9071-8512
Ivana Aragão Lira VasconcelosDepartment of Nutrition, University of Brasília, 70910-900 Brasília, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6543-7690
Renata Puppin ZandonadiDepartment of Nutrition, University of Brasília, 70910-900 Brasília, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0370-3089
Raquel Braz Assunção BotelhoDepartment of Nutrition, University of Brasília, 70910-900 Brasília, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0369-287X
Universidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

Universidade de Brasília DPI/DIRPE 02/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a specific instrument to evaluate food neophobia focused on Brazilian children and to perform the content validation and internal semantic consistency and reproducibility evaluation of the instrument. Three steps were necessary to conduct the study: (i) development of the instrument, (ii) internal validation (content validation and semantic evaluation) of the food neophobia instrument using 22 experts in the first round and 20 of them in the second round, (iii) evaluation of the internal consistency and reproducibility of the instrument with the children's caregivers, using the test-retest (where the same caregiver-

Indexed as

Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake DisorderAdultBrazilCaregiversChildDelphi TechniqueFeeding and Eating Disorders of ChildhoodFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleParentsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairescaregiver perceptionchildfood neophobiainstrument

Identifiers

PMID32629847
PMCPMC7400101
OpenAlexW3040333584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.