Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32629804›Full record

ReviewViruses2020

Repurposing Therapeutics for Potential Treatment of SARS-CoV-2: A Review.

Jennifer Santos, Stephanie Brierley, Mohit J Gandhi, Michael A Cohen, Phillip C Moschella, Arwen B L Declan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Aspirin in COVID-19: Pros and Cons.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  14. Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 PLpro.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Evaluation of in vitro activity of copper gluconate against SARS-CoV-2 using confocal microscopy-based high content screening.Journal of trace elements in medicine and biology : organ of the Society for Minerals and Trace Elements (GMS) · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer SantosUniversity of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC 29605, USA.
Stephanie BrierleyUniversity of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC 29605, USA.
Mohit J GandhiUniversity of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC 29605, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1796-1866
Michael A CohenDepartment of Pharmacy, Prisma Health Upstate, Greenville, SC 29605, USA; Michael.Cohen@prismahealth.org .
Phillip C MoschellaDepartment of Emergency Medicine Prisma Health Upstate, Greenville, SC 29605, USA.
Arwen B L DeclanDepartment of Emergency Medicine Prisma Health Upstate, Greenville, SC 29605, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8757-8950
Prisma Health · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for proven disease-specific treatments for the novel pandemic coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 necessitates a worldwide search for therapeutic options. Since the SARS-CoV-2 virus shares extensive homology with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, effective therapies for SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV may also have therapeutic potential for the current COVID-19 outbreak. To identify therapeutics that might be repositioned for treatment of the SARS-CoV-2 disease COVID-19, we strategically reviewed the literature to identify existing therapeutics with evidence of efficacy for the treatment of the three coronaviruses that cause severe respiratory illness (SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2). Mechanistic and in vitro analyses suggest multiple promising therapeutic options with potential for repurposing to treat patients with COVID-19. Therapeutics with particularly high potential efficacy for repurposing include camostat mesylate, remdesivir, favipiravir, tocilizumab, baricitinib, convalescent plasma, and humanized monoclonal antibodies. Camostat mesylate has shown therapeutic potential, likely by preventing viral entry into epithelial cells. In early research, the targeted antivirals remdesivir and favipiravir appear to benefit patients by decreasing viral replication; clinical trials suggest that remdesivir speeds recovery from COVID-19. Tocilizumab and baricitinib appear to improve mortality by preventing a severe cytokine storm. Convalescent plasma and humanized monoclonal antibodies offer passive immunity and decreased recovery time. This review highlights potential therapeutic options that may be repurposed to treat COVID-19 and suggests opportunities for further research.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Severe Acute Respiratory SyndromeAntiviral AgentscoronavirusCOVID-19repositioningrepurposingSARS-CoV-2therapeuticstreatment

Identifiers

PMID32629804
PMCPMC7412090
OpenAlexW3039994917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.