ArticleMedicine2020
High-intensity interval training for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- High intensity interval training vs. moderate intensity continuous training on aerobic capacity and functional capacity in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe benefits of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) are well-known, there is insufficient evidence about the effects of HIIT on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
methodMultiple databases include MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar are used to search for randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of HIIT on HFpEF. All related articles published with the English language with no time limitation will be included. Two reviews independently conducted the selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. The primary outcome is exercise capacity. The secondary outcomes include quality of life (QoL), blood pressure (BP), ventricular function, and left ventricular diastolic function, symptom improvement, endothelial function, and arterial stiffness. Data analysis is performed with Review Manager Software (Version 5.3).
resultThis systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy of HIIT on HFpEF, its outcome will provide reliable evidence for future studies.
conclusionThe findings of this study will be published in a related peer-reviewed journal. REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202050097.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.