Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32629656›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam in procedural sedation and analgesia: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.

Feng Wang, Qian Zhou, Minhuan Shen, Jing Quan, Jiejuan Chen, Jing Shi, Xiaohua Zou

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05437497 (Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Remimazolam for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration/Biopsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05437497 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Remimazolam for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration/Biopsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled264ConditionsEndoscopic Ultrasonography-guided Fine Needle Aspiration, Sedation Complication, RemimazolamArmsRemimazolam Injection, Propofol Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Safety and efficacy of remimazolam in sedation dentistry: a scoping review.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The EDFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.

Feng WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Gui yang, China.
Qian Zhou
Minhuan Shen
Jing Quan
Jiejuan Chen
Jing Shi
Guiyang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemimazolam is a newly developed benzodiazepine as an alternative of conventional sedatives in the procedure of anesthesia. For the purpose of evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam sedation during an endoscopy, we will perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared remimazolam with midazolam and/or placebo.

methodsWe will search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) from inception to December 2019 for randomized controlled trials that investigated efficacy and safety of remimazolam during an endoscopy. The job will be performed without language restriction. Experimental groups will include the interventions of remimazolam, while control groups will involve midazolam, placebo, or no controls. The primary outcome will be the onset time, followed by the secondary outcomes of the recovery time, the incidence of hypotension, the incidence of hypoxia and the incidence of bradycardia. Relative ratio or standardized mean difference will be used to measure the effect size of remimazolam. We will use I statistics to assess the between-study heterogeneity in each meta-analysis, Eager's test to detect publication bias.

resultsThe results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: There is no need for ethical approval because all data used in this meta-analysis have been published. In addition, all data will be analyzed anonymously during the review process. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020170745.

Indexed as

BenzodiazepinesHypnotics and SedativesAnalgesiaHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicProcedural SedationSystematic Reviews as TopicBenzodiazepinesHypnotics and Sedativesremimazolam

Identifiers

PMID32629656
PMCPMC7337542
OpenAlexW3039217230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.