ArticleMedicine2020
Screening and identification of key gene in sepsis development: Evidence from bioinformatics analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence Drives Advances in Multi-Omics Analysis and Precision Medicine for Sepsis.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Candidate target genes in sepsis diagnosis and therapy: identifying hub genes with a spotlight on KLRB1.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Article
- Identification of key biomarkers in neonatal sepsis by integrated bioinformatics analysis and clinical validation.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Article
- Bioinformatics Analysis Identifies TNFRSF1A as a Biomarker of Liver Injury in Sepsis TNFRSF1A is a Biomarker for Septic Liver Injury.Genetics research · 2022Article
- MiR-940 Serves as a Diagnostic Biomarker in Patients with Sepsis and Regulates Sepsis-Induced Inflammation and Myocardial Dysfunction.Journal of inflammation research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis is one of the leading causes of mortality in intensive care units (ICU). The growing incidence rate of sepsis and its high mortality rate result are very important sociosanitary problems. Sepsis is a result of infection which can cause systemic inflammatory and organ failure. But the pathogenesis and the molecular mechanisms of sepsis is still not well understood. The aim of the present study was to identify the candidate key genes in the progression of sepsis.Microarray datasets GSE28750, GSE64457, and GSE95233 were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, and function enrichment analyses were performed. The protein-protein interaction network (PPI) was constructed and the module analysis was performed using STRING and Cytoscape. Furthermore, to verify the results of the bioinformatics analyses, the expression levels of selected DEGs were quantified by Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) in libobolysaccharide (LPS)-induced Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs) to support the result of bioinformatics analysis.Thirteen hub genes were identified and biological process analysis revealed that these genes were mainly enriched in apoptotic process, inflammatory response, innate immune response. Hub genes with high degrees, including MAPK14, SLC2A3, STOM, and MMP8, were demonstrated to have an association with sepsis. Furthermore, RT-PCR results showed that SLC2A3 and MAPK14 were significantly upregulated in the HUVECs induced by LPS compared with controls.In conclusion, DEGs and hub genes identified in the present study help us understand the molecular mechanisms of sepsis, and provide candidate targets for diagnosis and treatment of sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.