Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32629645›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Biological reconstruction in the treatment of extremity sarcoma in femur, tibia, and humerus.

Weitao Yao, Qiqing Cai, Jiaqiang Wang, Peng Zhang, Xin Wang, Xinhui Du, Xiaohui Niu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Weitao YaoBone and Soft Department, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zheng Zhou University, He Nan cancer Hospital.ORCID 0000-0002-2963-8775
Qiqing CaiBone and Soft Department, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zheng Zhou University, He Nan cancer Hospital.
Jiaqiang WangBone and Soft Department, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zheng Zhou University, He Nan cancer Hospital.
Peng ZhangBone and Soft Department, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zheng Zhou University, He Nan cancer Hospital.
Xin WangBone and Soft Department, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zheng Zhou University, He Nan cancer Hospital.
Xinhui DuBone and Soft Department, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zheng Zhou University, He Nan cancer Hospital.
Xiaohui NiuDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Ji Shui Tan Hospital, Peking University. Beijing, China, No. 31 Xin Jie Kou Dong Jie, Xi Cheng District, Beijing, China.
Henan Cancer Hospital · CNBeijing Tian Tan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the feasibility, clinical effect, and complications related to biological reconstruction techniques for long limb malignant bone tumors after excision.This retrospective study included eighty patients with malignant bone tumors treated at our hospital between January 2007 and January 2019. After tumor resection, 52 cases of intercalary and 28 cases of osteoarticular bone grafts were used. The implanted bone included devitalized recycling bone, fibular, and allograft.The average follow up period was 42.19 months for 80 patients, among whom 15 (18.75%) died. The 5-year EFS and OS were 58% and 69%, respectively. The average length of the replanted bone was 18.57 cm. The MSTS scores of intercalary and osteoarticular bone grafts were 87.24% and 64.00%, respectively. In 23 cases (44.23%) of metaphyseal and 26 cases (32.5%) of the diaphysis, bone graft union was obtained at the first stage. The factors affecting bone union were the patient's gender, age, devitalization bone methods and whether the implanted bone was completely fixed. Postoperative complications included delayed bone union in 15 patients, fractures in 25 cases, nonunion in 22 cases, bone resorption in 14 cases, and postoperative infection in 4 cases. Twenty-eight cases of bone grafting required revision surgery, including replacement of internal fixation, autologous bone graft, debridement, removal of internal fixation, and replacement with prosthetic replacement.Biological reconstructions with massive bone grafts are useful in the reconstruction of certain malignant extremity bone tumors after wide excision.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBone NeoplasmsBone TransplantationChildFemaleFemoral NeoplasmsHumansHumerusMalePlastic Surgery ProceduresRetrospective StudiesSarcomaTibiaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32629645
PMCPMC7337607
OpenAlexW3040267041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.