Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32629424›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2020

Strategies to Increase Peer Support Specialists' Capacity to Use Digital Technology in the Era of COVID-19: Pre-Post Study.

Karen L Fortuna, Amanda L Myers, Danielle Walsh, Robert Walker, George Mois, Jessica M Brooks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Investigating the Fidelity of Digital Peer Support: A Preliminary Approach using Natural Language Processing to Scale High-Fidelity Digital Peer Support.Biomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Supporting the Quadruple Aim Using Simulation and Human Factors During COVID-19 Care.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karen L Fortuna *Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Concord, NH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0343-2346
Amanda L Myers *Department of Public Health, Rivier University, Nashua, NH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8760-0938
Danielle Walsh *Department of Psychology, Framingham State University, Framingham, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4115-2508
Robert Walker *Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0457-9297
George Mois *School of Social Work, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5414-6097
Jessica M Brooks *School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0830-3527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior to the outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), telemental health to support mental health services was primarily designed for individuals with professional clinical degrees, such as psychologists, psychiatrists, registered nurses, and licensed clinical social workers. For the first the time in history, peer support specialists are offering Medicaid-reimbursable telemental health services during the COVID-19 crisis; however, little effort has been made to train peer support specialists on telehealth practice and delivery.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to explore the impact of the Digital Peer Support Certification on peer support specialists' capacity to use digital peer support technology.

methodsThe Digital Peer Support Certification was co-produced with peer support specialists and included an education and simulation training session, synchronous and asynchronous support services, and audit and feedback. Participants included 9 certified peer support specialists between the ages of 25 and 54 years (mean 39 years) who were employed as peer support specialists for 1 to 11 years (mean 4.25 years) and had access to a work-funded smartphone device and data plan. A pre-post design was implemented to examine the impact of the Digital Peer Support Certification on peer support specialists' capacity to use technology over a 3-month timeframe. Data were collected at baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months.

resultsOverall, an upward trend in peer support specialists' capacity to offer digital peer support occurred during the 3-month certification period.

conclusionsThe Digital Peer Support Certification shows promising evidence of increasing the capacity of peer support specialists to use specific digital peer support technology features. Our findings also highlighted that this capacity was less likely to increase with training alone and that a combinational knowledge translation approach that includes both training and management will be more successful.

Indexed as

COVID-19mental healthpeer supporttelemental healthtraining

Identifiers

PMID32629424
PMCPMC7380901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.