Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32628915›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of medicine2021

Levodopa Positively Affects Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Anna G Figueroa, Brennan M Boyd, Cory A Christensen, Cameron G Javid, Brian S McKay, Timothy C Fagan, Robert W Snyder

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Functional polymorphisms in pigmentation-related genesBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Zinc in eye health, retinal biology and disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Different Therapeutic Approaches for Dry and Wet AMD.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Repurposing Drugs for Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna G FigueroaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science.
Brennan M BoydCollege of Medicine.
Cory A ChristensenCollege of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
Cameron G JavidRetina Associates, Tucson, Ariz.
Brian S McKayDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science.
Timothy C FaganCollege of Medicine; Snyder Biomedical Corporation, Tucson, Ariz. Electronic address: tcfagan@arizona.edu.
Robert W SnyderSnyder Biomedical Corporation, Tucson, Ariz; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
University of Arizona · USRetina Associates · US

Funding

RPE Trophic Activity for Retinal ProtectionR01EY026544 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI MCKAY, BRIAN S · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAge-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a common cause of blindness worldwide. Neovascular AMD (nAMD) is an advanced form of the disease, in which excess vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) induces growth of new blood vessels that leak fluid, accounting for 90% of vision loss in AMD. Dysfunction of the retinal pigment epithelium likely initiates AMD. Retinal pigment epithelial cells express a G protein-coupled receptor, GPR143, which downregulates VEGF in response to levodopa. Anti-VEGF therapy effectively treats nAMD, suggesting that excessive VEGF activity drives the pathology.

methodsIn an open-label pilot study, in patients with newly diagnosed nAMD and naïve to anti-VEGF injections (Cohort-1), the effects of carbidopa-levodopa on vision and anatomic outcomes were evaluated for 4 weeks. Then patients were followed 5 months further with ascending levodopa doses. Patients previously treated with anti-VEGF injection therapy (Cohort-2) were also treated with ascending levodopa doses and evaluated for 6 months.

resultsLevodopa was safe, well tolerated, and delayed anti-VEGF injection therapy while improving visual outcomes. In the first month, retinal fluid decreased by 29% (P = .02, n = 12) without anti-VEGF treatment. Through 6 months the decrease in retinal fluid was sustained, with a mean frequency of 0.38 injections/month. At month 6, mean visual acuity improved by 4.7 letters in Cohort-1 (P = .004, n = 15) and by 4.8 letters in Cohort-2 (P = .02, n = 11). Additionally, there was a 52% reduction in the need for anti-VEGF injections in Cohort-2 (P = .002).

conclusionsOur findings suggest efficacy and support the pharmacological targeting of GPR143 with levodopa for the treatment of nAMD in future studies.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCarbidopaCohort StudiesDopamine AgentsDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansLevodopaMacular DegenerationMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeCarbidopacarbidopa, levodopa drug combinationDopamine AgentsDrug CombinationsLevodopaAge-related macular degeneration (AMD)Carbidopa-levodopaGPR143L-DOPAnAMDNeovascular AMDProspective studyRetinal pigment epitheliumWet AMD

Identifiers

PMID32628915
PMCPMC7864558
OpenAlexW3038323972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.