Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32628814›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2020

Watershed-scale climate influences productivity of Chinook salmon populations across southcentral Alaska.

Leslie A Jones, Erik R Schoen, Rebecca Shaftel, Curry J Cunningham, Sue Mauger, Daniel J Rinella, Adam St Saviour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leslie A JonesAlaska Center for Conservation Science, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4953-7189
Erik R SchoenInstitute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA.
Rebecca ShaftelAlaska Center for Conservation Science, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, USA.
Curry J CunninghamFisheries, Aquatic Science, and Technology Laboratory, Alaska Pacific University, Anchorage, AK, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1234-1297
Sue MaugerCook Inletkeeper, Homer, AK, USA.
Daniel J RinellaAnchorage Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, AK, USA.
Adam St SaviourAlaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish, Palmer, AK, USA.

Funding

Alaska Center for Conservation Science, University of Alaska AnchorageAlaska EPSCoR National Science Foundation OIA-1208927Alaska Pacific University support from the Pollock Conservation Cooperative and the Groundfish ForumPacific States Marine Fisheries Commission 16-102GPollock Conservation Cooperative Research Center at the University of Alaska FairbanksState of Alaska
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ecosystems supporting Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) are changing rapidly as a result of climate change and habitat alteration. Understanding how-and how consistently-salmon populations respond to changes at regional and watershed scales has major implications for fisheries management and habitat conservation. Chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha) populations across Alaska have declined over the past decade, resulting in fisheries closures and prolonged impacts to local communities. These declines are associated with large-scale climate drivers, but uncertainty remains about the role of local conditions (e.g., precipitation, streamflow, and stream temperature) that vary among the watersheds where salmon spawn and rear. We estimated the effects of these and other environmental indicators on the productivity of 15 Chinook salmon populations in the Cook Inlet basin, southcentral Alaska, using a hierarchical Bayesian stock-recruitment model. Salmon spawning during 2003-2007 produced 57% fewer recruits than the previous long-term average, leading to declines in adult returns beginning in 2008. These declines were explained in part by density dependence, with reduced population productivity following years of high spawning abundance. Across all populations, productivity declined with increased precipitation during the fall spawning and early incubation period and increased with above-average precipitation during juvenile rearing. Above-average stream temperatures during spawning and rearing had variable effects, with negative relationships in many warmer streams and positive relationships in some colder streams. Productivity was also associated with regional indices of streamflow and ocean conditions, with high variability among populations. The cumulative effects of adverse conditions in freshwater, including high spawning abundance, heavy fall rains, and hot, dry summers may have contributed to the recent population declines across the region. Identifying both coherent and differential responses to environmental change underscores the importance of targeted, watershed-specific monitoring and conservation efforts for maintaining resilient salmon runs in a warming world.

Indexed as

EcosystemSalmonAlaskaAnimalsBayes TheoremClimate ChangeChinook salmonclimate changefisheriespopulation dynamicsprecipitation

Identifiers

PMID32628814
PMCPMC7496363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.