Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32628739›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Behavioral responses of Diaphorina citri to host plant volatiles in multiple-choice olfactometers are affected in interpretable ways by effects of background colors and airflows.

Haroldo Xavier Linhares Volpe, Odimar Zanuzo Zanardi, Rodrigo Facchini Magnani, Rejane Angélica Grigio Luvizotto, Victoria Esperança, Renato de Freitas, Jennifer Yslaine Delfino, Tatiana Aparecida Mulinari, Rômulo Igor de Carvalho, Nelson Arno Wulff and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Haroldo Xavier Linhares VolpeDepartment of Research and Development, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3092-4741
Odimar Zanuzo ZanardiDepartment of Research and Development, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1872-0749
Rodrigo Facchini MagnaniDepartment of Research and Development, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rejane Angélica Grigio LuvizottoDepartment of Research and Development, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Victoria EsperançaDepartment of Research and Development, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renato de FreitasDepartment of Research and Development, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jennifer Yslaine DelfinoDepartment of Research and Development, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tatiana Aparecida MulinariDepartment of Research and Development, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rômulo Igor de CarvalhoDepartment of Research and Development, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nelson Arno WulffDepartment of Research and Development, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo Pedreira de MirandaDepartment of Research and Development, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leandro PeñaDepartment of Research and Development, Fund for Citrus Protection (Fundecitrus), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In several phytophagous hemipterans, behavior appears to be mediated by both visual and chemical cues. For the Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae), olfactometric assays are generally difficult to interpret owing to the low proportion of individuals responding to odors (~30-40%), which compromises the efficiency and reliability of the results of behavioral tests. In the present study, the ACP behavioral response to emitted odors from sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) flushes in a 4-arm olfactometer using different colors (four white-, two white- and two yellow- on opposite sides, or four yellow-colored fields), and the role of the airflow in the concentration of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were assessed at two airflows [0.4 and 0.1 L/min (LPM)]. Exposure to 'Pera' sweet orange or clean air in treatments with four yellow-colored-fields increased the response rate of ACP females to the odor sources compared with exposure to 'Pera' sweet orange or clean air in treatments with four white-colored-fields, independently of the odor source and airflow tested. For the assays using two white- and two yellow-colored fields on opposite sides and 0.4 or 0.1 LPM airflow, the residence time of ACP females to odors ('Pera' sweet orange or clean air) was similar or higher in treatments using yellow- than those using white-colored fields. For both assays (VOCs and olfactometric behavioral parameters), the reduction in airflow from 0.4 to 0.1 LPM greatly changed the airborne concentration and ACP behavior. Quantitative chemical analyses revelead that the concentration of most compounds emitted by 'Pera' sweet orange flushes for the headspace using 0.1 LPM airflow were greater than the concentrations measured using 0.4 LPM airflow. Therefore, this treatment design provides an useful tool to assess the ACP behavioral response to the odors from citrus plants, and it can also help in the discrimination of dose-response screenings for VOCs or conspecific insects.

Indexed as

AirSmellAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCitrusColorDose-Response Relationship, DrugHemipteraVolatile Organic CompoundsVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID32628739
PMCPMC7337303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.