Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32628688›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2020

A qualitative exploration of cardiovascular disease patients' views and experiences with an eHealth cardiac rehabilitation intervention: The PATHway Project.

Orlagh O'Shea, Catherine Woods, Lauri McDermott, Roselien Buys, Nils Cornelis, Jomme Claes, Véronique Cornelissen, Anne Gallagher, Helen Newton, Niall Moyna and 6 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exercise, prescription and training in ACHD.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Orlagh O'SheaSchool of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2961-6717
Catherine WoodsDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Physical Activity for Health, Health Research Institute, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Lauri McDermottExWell Medical, Dublin, Ireland.
Roselien BuysDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Nils CornelisDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jomme ClaesDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3922-0038
Véronique CornelissenDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anne GallagherMater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Helen NewtonBeaumont University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Niall MoynaDepartment of Health & Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Noel McCaffreyExWell Medical, Dublin, Ireland.
Davide SustaDepartment of Health & Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Clare McDermottDepartment of Health & Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Ciara McCormackDepartment of Health & Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Werner BudtsDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5850-5413
Kieran MoranDepartment of Health & Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore participants' views and experiences of an eHealth phase 3 cardiac rehabilitation (CR) intervention: Physical Activity Towards Health (PATHway). Sixty participants took part in the PATHway intervention. Debriefs were conducted after the six-month intervention. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed with Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. Forty-four (71%) debriefs were conducted (n = 34 male, mean (SD) age 61 (10) years). Five key themes were identified: (1) Feedback on the components of the PATHway system, (2) Motivation, (3) Barriers to using PATHway, (4) Enablers to using PATHway, and (5) Post programme reflection. There were a number of subthemes within each theme, for example motivation explores participants motivation to take part in PATHway and participants motivation to sustain engagement with PATHway throughout the intervention period. Participant engagement with the components of the PATHway system was variable. Future research should focus on optimising participant familiarisation with eHealth systems and employ an iterative approach to development and evaluation.

Indexed as

AgedCardiac RehabilitationCardiovascular DiseasesConvalescenceExerciseFeedbackFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32628688
PMCPMC7337342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.