ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020
Accurate Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease for Patients With Hypertension From Electronic Health Records With Big Data and Machine-Learning Methods: Model Development and Performance Evaluation.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Synergistic review of automation impact of big data, AI, and ML in current data transformative era.F1000Research · 2025Pooled it
- Advanced applications in chronic disease monitoring using IoT mobile sensing device data, machine learning algorithms and frame theory: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in the risk prediction models of cardiovascular disease and development of an independent validation screening tool: a systematic review.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods Developed for Prediction of Diabetes Complications: A Systematic Review.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Multimodal Machine Learning Integrating Clinical and Proteomic Data for Early Prediction of Hypertensive Complications: A UKB Longitudinal Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a deep neural network for predicting coronary heart disease in hypertensive patients using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A Correlation between Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scores and Biomarkers of Inflammation and Infection in Patients with Sepsis.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Article
- Predicting Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in Individuals Below Screening Age Using Machine Learning and Real-World Data: Case Control Study.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Optimising coronary imaging decisions with machine learning: an external validation study.Open heart · 2025Article
- Urban and rural disparities in stroke prediction using machine learning among Chinese older adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Identification of novel serum lipid metabolism potential markers and metabolic pathways for oral cancer: a population-based study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Predicting hypertension and identifying most important factors among married women in Bangladesh using machine learning approach.PloS one · 2025Article
- Advancements in deep learning for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using multimodal neuroimaging: challenges and future directions.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2025Review
- Machine-learning-based prediction of cardiovascular events for hyperlipidemia population with lipid variability and remnant cholesterol as biomarkers.Health information science and systems · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in healthcare: a scoping review of perceived threats to patient rights and safety.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024Article
- Multimodal Identification of Molecular Factors Linked to Severe Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Artificial Intelligence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- HRP-OG: Online Learning with Generative Feature Replay for Hypertension Risk Prediction in a Nonstationary Environment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Pitfalls in Developing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Cardiovascular Diseases: Challenge and Solutions.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPredictions of cardiovascular disease risks based on health records have long attracted broad research interests. Despite extensive efforts, the prediction accuracy has remained unsatisfactory. This raises the question as to whether the data insufficiency, statistical and machine-learning methods, or intrinsic noise have hindered the performance of previous approaches, and how these issues can be alleviated.
objectiveBased on a large population of patients with hypertension in Shenzhen, China, we aimed to establish a high-precision coronary heart disease (CHD) prediction model through big data and machine-learning.
methodsData from a large cohort of 42,676 patients with hypertension, including 20,156 patients with CHD onset, were investigated from electronic health records (EHRs) 1-3 years prior to CHD onset (for CHD-positive cases) or during a disease-free follow-up period of more than 3 years (for CHD-negative cases). The population was divided evenly into independent training and test datasets. Various machine-learning methods were adopted on the training set to achieve high-accuracy prediction models and the results were compared with traditional statistical methods and well-known risk scales. Comparison analyses were performed to investigate the effects of training sample size, factor sets, and modeling approaches on the prediction performance.
resultsAn ensemble method, XGBoost, achieved high accuracy in predicting 3-year CHD onset for the independent test dataset with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of 0.943. Comparison analysis showed that nonlinear models (K-nearest neighbor AUC 0.908, random forest AUC 0.938) outperform linear models (logistic regression AUC 0.865) on the same datasets, and machine-learning methods significantly surpassed traditional risk scales or fixed models (eg, Framingham cardiovascular disease risk models). Further analyses revealed that using time-dependent features obtained from multiple records, including both statistical variables and changing-trend variables, helped to improve the performance compared to using only static features. Subpopulation analysis showed that the impact of feature design had a more significant effect on model accuracy than the population size. Marginal effect analysis showed that both traditional and EHR factors exhibited highly nonlinear characteristics with respect to the risk scores.
conclusionsWe demonstrated that accurate risk prediction of CHD from EHRs is possible given a sufficiently large population of training data. Sophisticated machine-learning methods played an important role in tackling the heterogeneity and nonlinear nature of disease prediction. Moreover, accumulated EHR data over multiple time points provided additional features that were valuable for risk prediction. Our study highlights the importance of accumulating big data from EHRs for accurate disease predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.