Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32628431›Full record

ArticleMelanoma research2020

Staging 18F-FDG PET/CT influences the treatment plan in melanoma patients with satellite or in-transit metastases.

Lodewijka H J Holtkamp, Annette H Chakera, Sebastian Fung, Jonathan R Stretch, Robyn P M Saw, Kenneth Lee, Sydney Ch'ng, Maria Gonzalez, John F Thompson, Louise Emmett and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Melanoma research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Precision matters: the value of PET/CT and PET/MRI in the clinical management of cervical cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Role and Potential ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Lodewijka H J HoltkampMelanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Annette H ChakeraMelanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Sebastian FungDepartment of Radiology, Mater Hospital.
Jonathan R StretchMelanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Robyn P M SawMelanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Kenneth LeeMelanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Sydney Ch'ngMelanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Maria GonzalezMelanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia.
John F ThompsonMelanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Louise EmmettDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Omgo E NiewegMelanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Melanoma Institute Australia · AUUniversity of Sydney · AUMater Hospital · GBSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AUUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly used to stage patients with palpable lymph node metastases from melanoma, but their role in patients with satellite and/or in-transit metastasis (S&ITM) is unclear. The aim of this study was to establish the diagnostic value of PET/CT and brain MRI in these patients, and to assess their influence on subsequent management decisions. In this prospective study, 25 melanoma patients with a first presentation of S&ITM who had no clinical evidence of palpable nodal or distant metastasis underwent whole-body F-FDG PET/CT and brain MRI after a tentative pre-scan treatment plan had been made. Sensitivity and specificity of imaging were determined by pathological confirmation, clinical outcome and repeat PET/CT and MRI at 6 months. PET/CT led to a modification of the initial treatment plan in four patients (16%). All four were upstaged (AJCC stage eighth edition). PET/CT was false-positive in one patient, who had a Schwannoma in his trapezius muscle. A thyroid carcinoma was an incidental finding in another patient. The sensitivity of PET/CT was 58% and specificity 83%. In 6 months following the baseline PET/CT, further sites of in-transit or systemic disease were identified in 10 patients (40%). Brain MRI did not alter the treatment plan or change the disease stage in any patient. Whole-body PET/CT improved staging in melanoma patients with S&ITM and changed the originally-contemplated treatment plan in 16%. MRI of the brain appeared not to be useful.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID32628431
PMCPMC7331822
OpenAlexW3022309194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.