Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32628112›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

The head direction circuit of two insect species.

Ioannis Pisokas, Stanley Heinze, Barbara Webb

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neuromorphic encoding strategies for a noisy magnetic sense.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  8. Path integration and optic flow in flying insects: a review of current evidence.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Optic flow based spatial vision in insects.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Review
  19. Global inhibition in head-direction neural circuits: a systematic comparison between connectome-based spiking neural circuit models.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Article
  20. Lineages to circuits: the developmental and evolutionary architecture of information channels into the central complex.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ioannis PisokasSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7426-3207
Stanley HeinzeLund Vision Group and NanoLund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8145-3348
Barbara WebbSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
University of Edinburgh · GBLund University · SE

Funding

H2020 European Research Council Grant agreement no. 714599University Of Edinburgh Graduate Student Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies of the Central Complex in the brain of the fruit fly have identified neurons with activity that tracks the animal's heading direction. These neurons are part of a neuronal circuit with dynamics resembling those of a ring attractor. The homologous circuit in other insects has similar topographic structure but with significant structural and connectivity differences. We model the connectivity patterns of two insect species to investigate the effect of these differences on the dynamics of the circuit. We illustrate that the circuit found in locusts can also operate as a ring attractor but differences in the inhibition pattern enable the fruit fly circuit to respond faster to heading changes while additional recurrent connections render the locust circuit more tolerant to noise. Our findings demonstrate that subtle differences in neuronal projection patterns can have a significant effect on circuit performance and illustrate the need for a comparative approach in neuroscience.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainDrosophila melanogasterGrasshoppersHeadNeuronsOrientation, Spatialcomputational biologyD. melanogasterhead directionneurosciencering attractorSchistocerca gregariasystems biology

Identifiers

PMID32628112
PMCPMC7419142
OpenAlexW3038283922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.