ArticleThe oncologist2020
Value of Precision Medicine in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Outcomes Associated with the Use of Companion Diagnostics.
Article in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Racial and ethnic disparities in genomic testing among lung cancer patients: a systematic review.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Pooled it
- Worldwide Prevalence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2022Pooled it
- Modality-specific survival outcomes of biomarker-matched therapy in unresected non-small cell lung cancer: a clinicogenomic cohort study.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Biomarker testing patterns among patients newly diagnosed with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, prostate cancer, and bladder cancer.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Article
- Simulation analysis of EGFR mutation detection: Oncomine Dx target test and AmoyDx panel impact on lung cancer treatment decisions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of a nationwide precision medicine program for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Germany: a historical cohort analysis.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024Article
- Biomarkers of lung cancer for screening and in never-smokers-a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2023Review
- A Systematic Review of Companion Diagnostic Tests by Immunohistochemistry for the Screening of Alectinib-Treated Patients in ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Trends in Use of Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients With Solid Tumors by Race and Ethnicity After Implementation of the Medicare National Coverage Determination.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network ALK Testing Guidelines for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in U.S. Community Medical Centers.The oncologist · 2021Observational
- Companion Diagnostics: State of the Art and New Regulations.Biomarker insights · 2021Review
- Novel Approach Using Administrative Claims to Evaluate Trends in Oncology Multigene Panel Testing for Patients Enrolled in Medicare Advantage Health Plans.JCO precision oncology · 2021Article
- Value of Precision Medicine in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Outcomes Associated with the Use of Companion Diagnostics.The oncologist · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCompanion diagnostic (CDx) testing for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) identifies patients more likely to benefit from biomarker-driven treatments.
methodsPatients with nonsquamous cell (non-Sq) aNSCLC from the Flatiron Health database (diagnosed January 1, 2011-May 31, 2018) who had CDx testing were compared with those who had no reported evidence of testing. The association between CDx testing and overall survival was evaluated by unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models. Logistic regression analysis identified characteristics associated with CDx testing. The revised modified Lung Cancer Prognostic Index and other factors identified a priori were included in the adjusted models.
resultsA total of 17,555 patients with non-Sq aNSCLC (CDx, n = 14,732; no CDx, n = 2,823) with mean ± SD age of 67.2 ± 10.0 years were included. Most were insured (91.7%) and white (67.1%). Asian patients and those who were never-smokers were more likely to undergo CDx testing. Those with CDx testing lived longer than those without (median [95% confidence interval (CI)] survival, 13.04 [12.62-13.40] vs. 6.01 [5.72-6.24] months) and had a decreased mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.72 [0.69-0.76]). A survival advantage was also seen for patients with CDx testing who received biomarker-driven first-line therapy.
conclusionPatients with non-Sq aNSCLC who had CDx testing had a greater survival benefit than those without, supporting broader use of CDx testing in routine clinical practice to identify patients more likely to benefit from precision medicine. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Companion diagnostic (CDx) testing coupled with biomarker-driven treatment offers a greater survival benefit for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). In this study, patients with nonsquamous aNSCLC from Flatiron Health, a large, real-world oncology database, with CDx testing had a reduced mortality risk and lived longer than patients without reported evidence of CDx testing; those who received biomarker-driven therapy as their first line of treatment were likely to survive three times longer than those who did not. These results demonstrate the clinical utility of CDx testing as the first step in treating nonsquamous aNSCLC in real-world clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.