Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32627737›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2020

Making a difference in multi-data-set crystallography: simple and deterministic data-scaling/selection methods.

Greta M Assmann, Meitian Wang, Kay Diederichs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Room-temperature serial synchrotron crystallography of Drosophila cryptochrome.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Single-support serial isomorphous replacement phasing.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Current research in structural biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Greta M AssmannDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz, Box 647, D-78457 Konstanz, Germany.
Meitian WangSwiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5340-3036
Kay DiederichsDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz, Box 647, D-78457 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5360-0905

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phasing by single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (SAD) from multiple crystallographic data sets can be particularly demanding because of the weak anomalous signal and possible non-isomorphism. The identification and exclusion of non-isomorphous data sets by suitable indicators is therefore indispensable. Here, simple and robust data-selection methods are described. A multi-dimensional scaling procedure is first used to identify data sets with large non-isomorphism relative to clusters of other data sets. Within each cluster that it identifies, further selection is based on the weighted ΔCC

Indexed as

Crystallography, X-RayData AnalysisModels, MolecularDatasets as TopicProtein ConformationProteinsProteinsdata scalingdata selectionnon-isomorphismSAD phasingserial crystallography

Identifiers

PMID32627737
PMCPMC7336379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.