Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32627582›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2021

Patient and Provider Perspectives on a Novel Mobile Health Intervention for Low-Income Pregnant Women With Gestational or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Lynn M Yee, Karolina Leziak, Jenise Jackson, Angelina Strohbach, Rana Saber, Charlotte M Niznik, Melissa A Simon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03240874 (SweetMama Usability and Feasibility), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03240874 nacompletednot on this map

SweetMama Usability and Feasibility: Testing of a Novel Technology for Diabetes Education and Support to Pregnant Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2017 to 2021Enrolled80ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus in PregnancyArmsSweetMama Focus Groups, SweetMama Individual Testing, SweetMama Feasibility Testing - Pilot Randomized Trial
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lynn M YeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6274-0544
Karolina LeziakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jenise JacksonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Angelina StrohbachDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rana SaberInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Charlotte M NiznikDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Melissa A SimonDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Research Career Development in Obstetrics and GynecologyK12HD050121 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Serdar E. Bulun · 2005 to 2026
$7.2M
SweetMama: Leveraging technology for diabetes education and support to low-income pregnant womenR21HD094271 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI YEE, LYNN M · 2018 to 2019
$435k
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD050121NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD094271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of diabetes mellitus (DM) during pregnancy is burdensome given the intensity of required patient engagement and skills, especially for women with greater social disadvantage. Mobile health (mHealth) technology is a promising avenue for DM health promotion, but few evidence-based mHealth tools exist for pregnancy. Thus, we designed a theory-driven mHealth tool called SweetMama, and planned a priori to gather usability and acceptability feedback from patients and providers to ensure a user-centered design.

methodsIn this qualitative assessment, we solicited patient and provider feedback on this novel educational and motivational mobile application for low-income pregnant women with type 2 or gestational DM. Patients and providers participated in separate focus groups. Participants shared feedback regarding SweetMama's visual appeal, architecture, and content. SweetMama modifications were made in an iterative manner. Transcripts were analyzed using the constant comparative technique.

resultsPatient (

conclusionsSweetMama users had largely positive feedback about the mHealth tool's appeal, content, and functionality. Suggested improvements were incorporated in preparation for further evaluation steps, which include longitudinal usability testing, feasibility trials, and larger trials to determine the efficacy of SweetMama use for improving perinatal outcomes.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Mobile ApplicationsTelemedicineFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant Peoplebehavioral interventiongestational diabetesmobile applicationpregnancyqualitative researchtype 2 diabetesuser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID32627582
PMCPMC8442184
OpenAlexW3039242172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.