Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32627216›Full record

ArticleTransfusion2020

Characteristics and serological patterns of COVID-19 convalescent plasma donors: optimal donors and timing of donation.

Ling Li, Xunliang Tong, Hanwei Chen, Rui He, Qilu Lv, Ru Yang, Lei Zhao, Jue Wang, Haixia Xu, Chuanqiao Liu and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. SARS-CoV-2 serology and virology trends in donors and recipients of convalescent plasma.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2020
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The COVID-19 Patient in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization in Convalescent Plasma and Commercial Lots of Plasma-Derived Immunoglobulin.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ling LiClinical Transfusion Research Center, Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6053-6251
Xunliang TongDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Hospital, National Respiratory Quality Control Center, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
Hanwei ChenWuhan Blood Center, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Rui HeClinical Transfusion Research Center, Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Qilu LvClinical Transfusion Research Center, Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Ru YangWuhan Blood Center, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Lei ZhaoWuhan Blood Center, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jue WangClinical Transfusion Research Center, Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Haixia XuClinical Transfusion Research Center, Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Chuanqiao LiuWuhan Blood Center, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Guoan ChenWuhan Blood Center, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Sitian ChenClinical Transfusion Research Center, Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Chenyue LiClinical Transfusion Research Center, Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jiajia QiaoClinical Transfusion Research Center, Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Juntao YangState Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yanyun WuUniversity of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8410-4349
Zhong LiuClinical Transfusion Research Center, Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8173-9656
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNWuhan Blood Center · CNBeijing Hospital · CNUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

The CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) 2016-I2M-3-024The CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) 2017-I2M-1-009The CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) 2020-I2M-CoV19-006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe lack of effective treatments against the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has led to the exploratory use of convalescent plasma for treating COVID-19. Case reports and case series have shown encouraging results. This study investigated SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and epidemiological characteristics in convalescent plasma donors, to identify criteria for donor selection.

methodsRecovered COVID-19 patients, aged 18-55 years, who had experienced no symptoms for more than 2 weeks, were recruited. Donor characteristics such as disease presentations were collected and SARS-CoV-2 N-specific IgM, IgG, and S-RBD-specific IgG levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

resultsWhereas levels of N-specific IgM antibody declined after recovery, S-RBD-specific and N-specific IgG antibodies increased after 4 weeks from the onset of symptoms, with no significant correlation to age, sex, or ABO blood type. Donors with the disease presentation of fever exceeding 38.5°C or lasting longer than 3 days exhibited higher levels of S-RBD-specific IgG antibodies at the time of donation. Of the 49 convalescent plasma donors, 90% had an S-RBD-specific IgG titer of ≥1:160 and 78% had a titer of ≥1:640 at the time of plasma donation. Of the 30 convalescent plasma donors, who had donated plasma later than 28 days after the onset of symptoms and had a disease presentation of fever lasting longer than 3 days or a body temperature exceeding 38.5°C, 100% had an S-RBD-specific IgG titer of ≥1:160 and 93% had a titer of ≥1:640.

conclusionThis study indicates that the S-RBD-specific IgG antibody reaches higher levels after 4 weeks from the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. We recommend the following selection criteria for optimal donation of COVID-19 convalescent plasma: 28 days after the onset of symptoms and with a disease presentation of fever lasting longer than 3 days or a body temperature exceeding 38.5°C. Selection based on these criteria can ensure a high likelihood of achieving sufficiently high S-RBD-specific IgG titers.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsConvalescenceAdolescentAdultAntibodies, ViralBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 SerotherapyFeverHumansImmunization, PassiveImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MMiddle AgedPandemicsAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32627216
PMCPMC7361741
OpenAlexW3040580036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.