Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32627140›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2020

Brain to blood efflux as a mechanism underlying the neuroprotection mediated by rapid remote preconditioning in brain ischemia.

Jana Jachova, Miroslav Gottlieb, Miroslava Nemethova, Martin Bona, Petra Bonova

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jana JachovaInstitute of Neurobiology, Biomedical Research Center of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01, Košice, Slovak Republic.
Miroslav GottliebInstitute of Neurobiology, Biomedical Research Center of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01, Košice, Slovak Republic.
Miroslava NemethovaInstitute of Neurobiology, Biomedical Research Center of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01, Košice, Slovak Republic.
Martin BonaDepartment of Medical Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, tr. SNP 1, 040 11, Košice, Slovak Republic.
Petra BonovaInstitute of Neurobiology, Biomedical Research Center of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01, Košice, Slovak Republic. bonova@saske.sk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5427-8126
Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKUniversity of Pavol Jozef Šafárik · SK

Funding

Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV VEGA 1/0218/18Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV VEGA 2/0029/18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutamate represents the main excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian brain; however, its excessive elevation in the extracellular space is cytotoxic and can result in neuronal death. The ischemia initiated brain damage reflects changes in glutamate concentration in peripheral blood. This paper investigated the role of the brain in blood efflux of the glutamate in an improved tolerance of the brain tissue to ischemic conditions. In the rat model of focal brain ischemia, the neuroprotection was initiated by rapid remote ischemic preconditioning (rRIPC). Our results confirmed a strong neuroprotective effect of rRIPC. We observed reduced infarction by about 78% related to improved neuronal survival by about 70% in the ischemic core. The level of tissue glutamate in core and penumbra dropped significantly and decreased to control value also in the core region of the contralateral hemisphere. Despite significant improvement of blood-brain barrier integrity (by about 76%), the additional gain of glutamate content in the peripheral blood was caused by rRIPC. Based on our results, we can assume that neuroprotection mediated by rapid remote ischemic preconditioning could lie in the regulated, whole-brain release of glutamate from nerve tissue to the blood, which preserves neurons from the exposure to glutamate toxicity and results in reduced infarction.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain IschemiaCell DeathGlutamic AcidIschemic PreconditioningMaleNeuronsNeuroprotectionNeuroprotective AgentsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyGlutamic AcidNeuroprotective AgentsBrain to blood glutamate effluxFocal ischemiaGlutamateRapid remote preconditioning

Identifiers

PMID32627140
OpenAlexW3039606227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.