ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2020
Crossmodal associations modulate multisensory spatial integration.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coupling Causal Inference and Cross-Modal Recalibration: A Unified Framework for Adaptive Multisensory Perception.Biology · 2026Review
- Perceived Multisensory Common Cause Relations Shape the Ventriloquism Effect but Only Marginally the Trial-Wise Aftereffect.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Characterization of 2D precision and accuracy for combined visual-haptic localization.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Interoceptive inference and prediction in food-related disorders.Genes & development · 2024Review
- Article
- Exploring crossmodal correspondences for future research in human movement augmentation.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Multisensory integration in humans with spinal cord injury.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Changing the Tendency to Integrate the Senses.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Repeated exposure to either consistently spatiotemporally congruent or consistently incongruent audiovisual stimuli modulates the audiovisual common-cause prior.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying cross-modal associations and their influence on perceptual decisions.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Visuo-proprioceptive integration and recalibration with multiple visual stimuli.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Top-down task-specific determinants of multisensory motor reaction time enhancements and sensory switch costs.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
According to the Bayesian framework of multisensory integration, audiovisual stimuli associated with a stronger prior belief that they share a common cause (i.e., causal prior) are predicted to result in a greater degree of perceptual binding and therefore greater audiovisual integration. In the present psychophysical study, we systematically manipulated the causal prior while keeping sensory evidence constant. We paired auditory and visual stimuli during an association phase to be spatiotemporally either congruent or incongruent, with the goal of driving the causal prior in opposite directions for different audiovisual pairs. Following this association phase, every pairwise combination of the auditory and visual stimuli was tested in a typical ventriloquism-effect (VE) paradigm. The size of the VE (i.e., the shift of auditory localization towards the spatially discrepant visual stimulus) indicated the degree of multisensory integration. Results showed that exposure to an audiovisual pairing as spatiotemporally congruent compared to incongruent resulted in a larger subsequent VE (Experiment 1). This effect was further confirmed in a second VE paradigm, where the congruent and the incongruent visual stimuli flanked the auditory stimulus, and a VE in the direction of the congruent visual stimulus was shown (Experiment 2). Since the unisensory reliabilities for the auditory or visual components did not change after the association phase, the observed effects are likely due to changes in multisensory binding by association learning. As suggested by Bayesian theories of multisensory processing, our findings support the existence of crossmodal causal priors that are flexibly shaped by experience in a changing world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.