Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32627101›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

The effects of field-realistic doses of imidacloprid on Melipona quadrifasciata (Apidae: Meliponini) workers.

Pedro Brito, Marcos Elias, Carlos Silva-Neto, Edison Sujii, Daniela Silva, Bruno Gonçalves, Edivani Franceschinelli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pedro BritoLaboratório de Estudos Morfológicos, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil. pedrovalebrito@yahoo.com.br.
Marcos EliasLaboratório de Biologia Reprodutiva de Plantas, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Carlos Silva-NetoLaboratório de Sementes e Coleções Biológicas, Instituto Federal de Educação Ciência e Tecnologia de Goiás, Goiás, Brazil.
Edison SujiiCentro Nacional de Pesquisa de Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Brasilia, Brazil.
Daniela SilvaLaboratório de Mutagênese, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Bruno GonçalvesLaboratório de Biotecnologia Ambiental e Ecotoxicologia, Instituto Tropical de Patologia e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Edivani FranceschinelliLaboratório de Biologia Reprodutiva de Plantas, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Goiás · BRBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRInstituto Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior n/aFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás 20121076700081Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás 201810267001731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of Brazilian native bees can improve tomato production by increasing pollination effectiveness. However, the extensive use of pesticides in tomato cultures may be harmful to bees. Imidacloprid-based insecticides are used in tomato plantations because of its high efficiency against tomato pests. This study investigated the effects of oral intake of field-realistic concentrations of imidacloprid by M. quadrifasciata workers, a stingless native bee from Brazil and effective pollinators of tomato crops. The oral intake of sucrose syrup added with 10, 35, or 70 ppb of imidacloprid did not increase the mortality rate when compared with the control group. However, we observed a reduction in the workers' motility and food consumption. We also treated M. quadrifasciata workers with sucrose syrup mixed with an imidacloprid-based insecticide (Evidence 700 WG®, Bayer), with the final concentration of 250 ppb of imidacloprid. This treatment did not cause visible alterations of the intestine absorptive cells of the bees' midgut and did not increase DNA damage. Therefore, the observed reduction of food consumption and locomotion behavior of M. quadrifasciata workers may contribute to the global effort to understand the contribution of neonicotinoids on bees' population decline process.

Indexed as

InsecticidesNitro CompoundsAnimalsBeesBrazilNeonicotinoidsPollinationimidaclopridInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsComet assayElectron microscopyInsecticideNeonicotinoidsPollinatorsStingless bees

Identifiers

PMID32627101
OpenAlexW3039513522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.