Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32627071›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2020

Percutaneous electrical stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve for the treatment of fecal incontinence: manometric results after 6 months of treatment.

Belen Manso, David Alias, Rocio Franco, Cesar Levano-Linares, Beatriz Laiz, Damian Garcia-Olmo, Manuel Duran, Jaime Ruiz-Tovar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of Tibial Nerve Electrostimulation in Patients With Fecal Incontinence: A Systematic Review.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Belen MansoInternational Doctorate School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.
David AliasDepartment of Surgery, Rey Juan Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Rocio FrancoDepartment of Surgery, Rey Juan Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Cesar Levano-LinaresDepartment of Surgery, Rey Juan Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Beatriz LaizDepartment of Surgery, Rey Juan Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Damian Garcia-OlmoDepartment of Surgery, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel DuranDepartment of Surgery, Rey Juan Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Jaime Ruiz-TovarFaculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain. jruiztovar@gmail.com.
Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPosterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a minimally invasive approach with little adverse effects, but obtaining good results as shown in the different scales for the evaluation of the severity of incontinence. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of PTNS based on manometric determinations of the anal sphincter and severity during a period of treatment of 6 months (18 sessions). PATIENTS AND

methodsA prospective interventional study of patients with fecal incontinence was performed. Subjects underwent one 30-min session every week for 12 weeks, followed by 6 sessions every 2 weeks. The effect on incontinence was evaluated by means of St. Marks and defecatory urgency scales, and manometry.

resultsSeventy-three patients were included. At baseline, 28.8% of the patients had a retention time of less than 1 min. At 12 weeks, 39.7% of the patients presented a retention time to 5-10 min and at 18 weeks 37% presented it over 10 min. At baseline, mean St Marks score was 15.1 + 5.1, improving after 12 weeks of treatment to 8.9 + 5 (p < 0.001). After 18 sessions, a greater improvement was observed up to 4 + 4.8 (p < 0.001). Maximum resting pressure showed a significant increase after treatment (mean increase 9.8 mmHg; p = 0.006). Similarly, maximum squeeze pressure also presented a significant augmentation (mean increase 25.3 mmHg; p = 0.002).

conclusionEighteen sessions of PTNS, divided in 12 weekly sessions and 6 sessions every 2 weeks, have shown to obtain benefits, reducing the St. Marks and the defecatory urgency scores, and increasing the manometric values.

Indexed as

Fecal IncontinenceTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationAnal CanalElectric StimulationHumansManometryProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTibial NerveTreatment OutcomeElectrical neurostimulationFecal incontinencePosterior tibial nerve

Identifiers

PMID32627071
OpenAlexW3039860900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.