ArticleMolecular medicine reports2020
Non‑invasive prenatal diagnosis of thalassemia through multiplex PCR, target capture and next‑generation sequencing.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Advances in Thalassemia Research: A Comprehensive Assessment From Diagnostic Technologies to Clinical Treatment.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Review
- Pharmacogenomics of Drugs Used in β-Thalassemia and Sickle-Cell Disease: From Basic Research to Clinical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Hotspots and status of Fetal Alpha-Thalassemia from 2009 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Reappraisal of evolving methods in non-invasive prenatal screening: Discovery, biology and clinical utility.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Cell-Free Fetal DNA and Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomopathies and Pediatric Monogenic Diseases: A Critical Appraisal and Medicolegal Remarks.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Noninvasive prenatal prediction of fetal haplotype with Spearman rank correlation analysis model.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prenatal clinical detection of thalassemia involves gap‑PCR and reverse dot blot (RDB) analysis of fetal DNA acquired through invasive methods. The present study aimed to develop a non‑invasive prenatal diagnostic method for thalassemia based on next‑generation sequencing (NGS). A total of eight families with proband children with thalassemia were recruited for the study during a subsequent pregnancy. The sequence of the thalassemia genes of the parents and proband were determined using NGS, based on a thalassemia AmpliSeq panel. Cell‑free plasma DNA from pregnant women related to the aforementioned proband was analyzed using an NGS panel, based on thalassemia‑associated capture probes. Heterozygous single nucleotide polymorphisms within the 10 kb regions flanking exons of the targeted thalassemia genes were acquired using probes or AmpliSeq and employed for parental haplotype construction using Trio‑based panel sequencing. The fetal haplotype was deduced from the parental haplotypes and relative haplotype dosage, and subsequently validated using gap‑PCR and RDB, based on invasively sampled amniotic fluid. A non‑invasive prenatal diagnosis procedure from maternal plasma fetal DNA was successfully developed based on haplotype analysis. The deduced haplotypes of eight fetuses were identical to the results of invasive prenatal diagnosis procedures, with an accuracy rate of 100%. Taken together, the present study demonstrated the potential for non‑invasive prenatal diagnosis of α‑ and β‑thalassemia using NGS and haplotype‑assisted analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.