Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32626934›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2020

[Editorial] COVID‑19: Post‑lockdown guidelines.

Ronald N Kostoff, Michael B Briggs, Alan L Porter, Michael Aschner, Demetrios A Spandidos, Aristidis Tsatsakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology and its clinical implications: An integrative overview of the pharmacotherapeutic management of COVID-19.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association · 2020
    Review
  9. [Comment] COVID‑19 vaccine safety.International journal of molecular medicine · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Tracking and Mining the COVID-19 Research Literature.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ronald N KostoffSchool of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Gainesville, VA 20155, USA.
Michael B BriggsIndependent Consultant, Roscommon, MI 48653, USA.
Alan L PorterSchool of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Michael AschnerDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Demetrios A SpandidosLaboratory of Clinical Virology, Medical School, University of Crete, 70013 Heraklion, Greece.
Aristidis TsatsakisLaboratory of Toxicology, Medical School, University of Crete, 70013 Heraklion, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since March, 2020, in response to the COVID‑19 pandemic, many countries have been on lockdown (at different levels of severity), restricting many activities and businesses that involve gatherings of large numbers of people in close proximity. Currently (early June, 2020), countries across the globe are in different stages of easing lockdown restrictions. Public policies for behaviors and actions during this transition period vary widely across countries and within country jurisdictions. The present editorial will address potential policies that could minimize resurgence of the present pandemic (the 'second‑wave') and reduce the likelihood and severity of similar future pandemics.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlCOVID-19HumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32626934
PMCPMC7307834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.