Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32626607›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences2020

Generating segmentation masks of herbarium specimens and a data set for training segmentation models using deep learning.

Alexander E White, Rebecca B Dikow, Makinnon Baugh, Abigail Jenkins, Paul B Frandsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Opportunities and Challenges in Applying AI to Evolutionary Morphology.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexander E WhiteData Science Lab Office of the Chief Information Officer Smithsonian Institution Washington D.C. USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9708-2406
Rebecca B DikowData Science Lab Office of the Chief Information Officer Smithsonian Institution Washington D.C. USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9668-3683
Makinnon BaughDepartment of Plant and Wildlife Sciences Brigham Young University Provo Utah USA.
Abigail JenkinsDepartment of Plant and Wildlife Sciences Brigham Young University Provo Utah USA.
Paul B FrandsenData Science Lab Office of the Chief Information Officer Smithsonian Institution Washington D.C. USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4801-7579

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premiseDigitized images of herbarium specimens are highly diverse with many potential sources of visual noise and bias. The systematic removal of noise and minimization of bias must be achieved in order to generate biological insights based on the plants rather than the digitization and mounting practices involved. Here, we develop a workflow and data set of high-resolution image masks to segment plant tissues in herbarium specimen images and remove background pixels using deep learning. METHODS AND

resultsWe generated 400 curated, high-resolution masks of ferns using a combination of automatic and manual tools for image manipulation. We used those images to train a U-Net-style deep learning model for image segmentation, achieving a final Sørensen-Dice coefficient of 0.96. The resulting model can automatically, efficiently, and accurately segment massive data sets of digitized herbarium specimens, particularly for ferns.

conclusionsThe application of deep learning in herbarium sciences requires transparent and systematic protocols for generating training data so that these labor-intensive resources can be generalized to other deep learning applications. Segmentation ground-truth masks are hard-won data, and we share these data and the model openly in the hopes of furthering model training and transfer learning opportunities for broader herbarium applications.

Indexed as

deep learningdigitized herbarium specimensfernsmachine learningsemantic segmentationU‐Net

Identifiers

PMID32626607
PMCPMC7328659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.