Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32626579›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2020

Peer mentoring for individuals with an eating disorder: a qualitative evaluation of a pilot program.

Freya Hanly, Benjamin Torrens-Witherow, Narelle Warren, David Castle, Andrea Phillipou, Jennifer Beveridge, Zoe Jenkins, Richard Newton, Leah Brennan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05543044 (Examining the Impact of Peer Mentors on Individuals Transitioning to Adult Eating Disorder Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05543044 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Examining the Impact of Peer Mentors on Individuals Transitioning to Adult Eating Disorder Treatment: A Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNova Scotia Health AuthorityRan2023 to 2027Enrolled64ConditionsEating DisordersArmsPeer mentor intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Freya Hanly *School of Behavioural and Health Science, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC Australia.
Benjamin Torrens-Witherow *School of Behavioural and Health Science, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5607-3220
Narelle WarrenSchool of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC Australia.
David CastleDepartment of Psychiatry, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC Australia.
Andrea PhillipouDepartment of Psychiatry, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC Australia.
Jennifer BeveridgeEating Disorders Victoria, Melbourne, VIC Australia.
Zoe JenkinsDepartment of Psychiatry, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC Australia.
Richard NewtonDepartment of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria Australia.
Leah BrennanSchool of Behavioural and Health Science, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter receiving intensive medical treatment; individuals with eating disorders often require ongoing care to maintain their recovery, build social networks, and reduce risk of relapse.

methodsTo address this important transition period, a six-month peer mentoring program was developed and piloted in Melbourne, Australia. Twelve adults with a past history of an eating disorder (mentors) were paired with 14 individuals with a current eating disorder (mentees). Pairs met for thirteen mentoring sessions in community settings. Throughout the program mentees and mentors completed reflective questions online. Upon completion of the program, qualitative interviews were conducted. Both online reflections and interviews explored themes relating to perceived benefits and challenges of participation in the peer mentoring program, and the differences between mentoring and traditional treatment.

resultsThematic analysis identified several benefits for mentees; including hope, reconnection with others, and re-engaging with the world. The majority of mentees described their mentor as uniquely supportive due to their past experience of an eating disorder. Mentors reported experiencing benefits such as increased connection with self and others, and indicated that the experience helped them positively reframe their past experience of an eating disorder. Ending the relationship at the completion of the program was a significant challenge for both groups, and managing boundaries was deemed a main challenge by mentors.

conclusionsOverall, results indicated that this mode of informal support may be worthy of further investigation as an adjunct to clinical treatment programs for this population.

trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials registration number - ACTRN12617001412325 - Date of registration - 05/10/2017 (Retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Anorexia nervosaEating disorderPeer mentoringPeer workTreatment

Identifiers

PMID32626579
PMCPMC7329554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.