ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2020
Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cinnamon Essential Oil: A Promising Natural Strategy for the Prevention of Rabbit Colibacillosis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Functional Immunonutraceutical Supplementation Enhances Humoral and Innate Immune Dynamics in a Controlled Immune-Challenge Rabbit Model.Nutrients · 2026Article
- A Welfare Assessment Tool to Harmonize Care and Management for Research Rabbits.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- A rabbit is not a mouse: a framework for the initial welfare assessment and long-term monitoring of genetically altered laboratory rabbits.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Enhancing Rabbit Welfare in Intensive Production Systems: A Review.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2026Review
- Outdoor Rearing and Behavioural Patterns in Diverse Rabbit Breeds: An Exploratory Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Modeling growth performance of heterogeneous rabbits in a pastured system using nonlinear, spline and random regression models.Veterinary and animal science · 2025Article
- Gastrointestinal Parasites, Ectoparasites, and Fungi in Rabbits Attending Clinical Consultations and from Private Owners and Breeders in Portugal.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Dietary Cannabidiol Supplementation on Growth Performance, Behavior, Blood Profile, Metabolomic Analysis, and Fatty Acid Composition in Rabbits: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Improve Welfare and Productivity.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- A New Method of Litter Equalization in Rabbit.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in rabbit husbandry: from reproductive monitoring to precision farming.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
- Impact of different controlled temperature and humidity conditions on the behaviour, posture and spatial needs in fattening rabbits.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Environmental Enrichment in Rabbit Husbandry: Comparative Impacts on Performance and Welfare.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Review
- Social, ethical, environmental, economic and technological aspects of rabbit meat production - A critical review.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Rabbits as a Reservoir of Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Thoughtful or distant farmer: Exploring the influence of human-animal relationships on rabbit stress, behaviour, and emotional responses in two distinct living environments.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2024Article
- Behaviour and welfare assessment of autochthonous slow-growing rabbits: The role of housing systems.PloS one · 2024Article
- Effect of rearing system (free-range vs cage) on gut and muscle histomorphology and microbial loads of Italian White breed rabbits.Animal bioscience · 2024Article
- Pregnancy Complications and Feto-Maternal Monitoring in Rabbits.Veterinary sciences · 2023Review
- Guidance document on the impact of water treatment processes on residues of active substances or their metabolites in water abstracted for the production of drinking water.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The AGRI committee of the European Parliament requested EFSA to assess the welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems, including organic production, and to update its 2005 scientific opinion about the health and welfare of rabbits kept for meat production. Considering reproducing does, kits and growing rabbits, this scientific opinion focusses on six different housing systems, namely conventional cages, structurally enriched cages, elevated pens, floor pens, outdoor/partially outdoor systems and organic systems. To compare the level of welfare in the different housing systems and rabbit categories, welfare impact scores for 20 welfare consequences identified from the literature were calculated, taking their occurrence, duration and severity into account. Based on the overall welfare impact score (sum of scores for the single welfare consequences), obtained via a 2-step expert knowledge elicitation process, the welfare of reproducing does is likely (certainty 66-90%) to be lower in conventional cages compared to the five other housing systems. In addition, it is likely to extremely likely (certainty 66-99%) that the welfare of kits is lower in outdoor systems compared to the other systems and that the welfare is higher in elevated pens than in the other systems. Finally, it is likely to extremely likely (certainty 66-99%) that the welfare of growing rabbits is lower in conventional cages compared to the other systems and that the welfare is higher in elevated pens than in the other systems. Ranking of the welfare consequences allowed an analysis of the main welfare consequences within each system and rabbit category. It was concluded that for reproducing does, as well as growing rabbits, welfare consequences related to behavioural restrictions were more prominent in conventional cages, elevated pens and enriched cages, whereas those related to health problems were more important in floor pens, outdoor and organic systems. Housing in organic rabbit farming is diverse, which can result in different welfare consequences, but the overall welfare impact scores suggest that welfare in organic systems is generally good.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.