Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32626465›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2019

Insects in food and feed - allergenicity risk assessment and analytical detection.

German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), National Reference Laboratory for Animal protein in Feed, NRL‐AP, Cristiano Garino, Jutta Zagon, Albert Braeuning

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. House Cricket (Insects · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. IntegratingCurrent research in food science · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Sustainable or Not? Insights on the Consumption of Animal Products in Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), National Reference Laboratory for Animal protein in Feed, NRL‐AP
Cristiano Garino
Jutta Zagon
Albert Braeuning

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects and insect-based food products have entered in the European market, carrying along issues of safety and the need of establishing a new legal framework. The consumption of massively reared insects can pose chemical and microbiological risks, and insect proteins are likely to represent a hazard for a subpopulation of allergic individuals. All insect-based products are considered 'Novel Food' and fall under EU regulation 2015/2283, according to which a specific application to the European Commission, followed by EFSA scientific evaluation, is needed before the product is put on the market. The recent EU Regulation 2017/893, entered into force on 1 July 2017, allowed a shortlist of seven insect species to be included in the formulation of feeds for aquaculture. Previously, the addition of any insect to any feed for farmed animals was not allowed, due to the risk of prion-derived diseases. The introduction of this new Regulation raises the issue to switch from a classical detection method based on microscopy to a more sophisticated and species-specific method. The overall aims of this EU-FORA project were (i) to set up a new next generation sequencing (NGS)-based molecular method for the identification of insect DNA in feeds for aquaculture; and (ii) to carry out a conceptual work on a probabilistic quantitative risk assessment focused on the allergenicity of yellow mealworm (

Indexed as

allergenicityFeedInsectNGS

Identifiers

PMID32626465
PMCPMC7015479
OpenAlexW2973962418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.