ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2019
Paving the way to better population health through personalised nutrition.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Does Personalized Nutrition Advice Improve Dietary Intake in Healthy Adults? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- The Future for Personalised Nutrition.Nutrition bulletin · 2026Article
- Improving the protein quality of New Zealand vegan diets: an optimisation modelling approach incorporating energy constraints and diet acceptability.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Advancing personalised and precision nutrition.Journal of nutritional science · 2026Review
- Personalized Nutrition in the Era of Digital Health: A New Frontier for Managing Diabetes and Obesity.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
- Nutritional intelligence in the food system: Combining food, health, data and AI expertise.Nutrition bulletin · 2025Review
- Salt taste perception, dietary salt intake, cardiovascular health and genetic variation in Zambian adults with HIV.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- The Interactions Between Diet and Gut Microbiota in Preventing Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2024Review
- Forgetting how we ate: personalised nutrition and the strategic uses of history.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2024Article
- A health technology assessment of personalized nutrition interventions using the EUnetHTA HTA Core Model.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2024Article
- The Future of Food.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Characterizing Precision Nutrition Discourse on Twitter: Quantitative Content Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Distinct patterns of personalised dietary advice delivered by a metabotype framework similarly improve dietary quality and metabolic health parameters: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Development of Personalized Nutrition: Applications in Lactose Intolerance Diagnosis and Management.Nutrients · 2021Review
- Paving the way to better population health through personalised nutrition.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As each individual person differs from the next in multiple ways, it is a beguiling idea that our individual nutritional needs also differ. In support of this idea, findings from nutritional intervention studies provide ample evidence of considerable interindividual variation in response to the same dietary exposure. We have a limited understanding of the mechanisms responsible for this variation but, following sequencing of the human genome, the role of genes in explaining interindividual differences has been centre stage. In addition, evidence of diet-gene interactions that influence phenotype, including health, emphasises the importance of both nature and nurture. Eating patterns are major determinants of health, so public health advice to reduce the risk of common complex diseases focuses on diet. However, most dietary interventions are relatively ineffective and personalised approaches that tailor the intervention to the individual may be more acceptable and more effective. That idea was tested in the Food4Me study in which adults from seven European countries were randomised to one of four treatment groups in an internet-delivered dietary intervention. Compared with the Control (standardised healthy eating advice), those people randomised to a personalised nutrition intervention had bigger, sustained changes, in eating behaviour after 6 months. However, including more complex phenotypic and/or genotypic information in developing the personalised nutrition advice had no added benefit. Research in personalised nutrition is broadening its scope to consider effects mediated by the gut microbiome as well as multiple aspects of genotype and phenotype. Such research has the potential to explain interindividual differences in the response to specific dietary factors and may provide a scientific basis for more refined approaches to personalised nutrition. However, if this research is to make a significant contribution to improving public health, it will need to address the psychological, social, economic and cultural factors that influence eating patterns to ensure that advice is converted into action and that improved dietary habits are sustained in perpetuity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.